Regarding pricing, I have not been involved until now. Currently, I am at a stage where they are trying to involve me in sales, which should provide a better picture of pricing structures. The user experience is excellent. The connection process is quite good. Installation and configuration are lightweight, allowing deployment through CLI commands. Compared to Oracle Internet Directory, which requires RCU creation and has database dependency, Oracle OUD is more efficient. It supports REST-based monitoring and offers easy upgrades and maintenance. During our migration from OID to Oracle OUD, we achieved zero downtime. Both Internet Directory and Oracle OUD support replication, load balancing, and high availability. Oracle OUD is scalable, has high performance, and can integrate with multiple identity stores. For modern IAM solutions, cloud solutions, or DevOps integration, Oracle OUD is the optimal choice, while OID is considered legacy. I rate Oracle OUD eight out of nine.
Regarding pricing, I have not been involved until now. Currently, I am at a stage where they are trying to involve me in sales, which should provide a better picture of pricing structures. The user experience is excellent. The connection process is quite good. Installation and configuration are lightweight, allowing deployment through CLI commands. Compared to Oracle Internet Directory, which requires RCU creation and has database dependency, Oracle OUD is more efficient. It supports REST-based monitoring and offers easy upgrades and maintenance. During our migration from OID to Oracle OUD, we achieved zero downtime. Both Internet Directory and Oracle OUD support replication, load balancing, and high availability. Oracle OUD is scalable, has high performance, and can integrate with multiple identity stores. For modern IAM solutions, cloud solutions, or DevOps integration, Oracle OUD is the optimal choice, while OID is considered legacy. I rate Oracle OUD eight out of nine.