When we go for POC, we learn about the tool’s advantages and disadvantages. We have got a few projects using this solution. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
Software Development Team Lead at a engineering company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Oct 28, 2022
If it is a business critical environment that needs to be up 99.999% of the time, LEAPWORK is the solution to go with because the ROI on it is good. We ended up using SmartBear because of how expensive LEAPWORK is. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Founder and Chief Technologist at Spider Technologies
Real User
May 21, 2021
As a testing tool, it is great. It does exactly what we need it to do, and it is very robust in the number of features that you could support for testing. Of course, everybody's use cases are different. You might just have a play-and-record kind of session, or you might have one where you're data-driven. This seems to support all of that, and from that side, it is a good product. We are not using all the capabilities of the tool. We would need additional instruction for some of the higher-level functions, but as a testing tool, I would rate Leapwork an eight out of ten.
Test Automation Tools are essential in software development, enabling developers to execute tests efficiently and ensure high-quality releases.These tools have become an integral part of the development lifecycle, providing a framework for executing tests automatically and helping developers identify and rectify defects early. They support continuous integration and deployment practices, reducing manual testing efforts and increasing the team's productivity. Companies integrate these tools to...
When we go for POC, we learn about the tool’s advantages and disadvantages. We have got a few projects using this solution. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
If it is a business critical environment that needs to be up 99.999% of the time, LEAPWORK is the solution to go with because the ROI on it is good. We ended up using SmartBear because of how expensive LEAPWORK is. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
As a testing tool, it is great. It does exactly what we need it to do, and it is very robust in the number of features that you could support for testing. Of course, everybody's use cases are different. You might just have a play-and-record kind of session, or you might have one where you're data-driven. This seems to support all of that, and from that side, it is a good product. We are not using all the capabilities of the tool. We would need additional instruction for some of the higher-level functions, but as a testing tool, I would rate Leapwork an eight out of ten.