Automated notification within the AWS CodeCommit pipeline or repository was never used. Notifications were not sent to users, as accounts were simply created. Notifications might be used when you do a pull request to notify the other reviewer to review the pull request, or when you have to approve something, to send notification to the approval team. The overall review rating for this product is seven out of ten.
I have been exploring AWS WAF, VPC subnets, and Lambda lately. I worked with AWS CodeCommit about six months ago, or maybe more. The integration of AWS Identity and Access Management and AWS CodeCommit for managing access control was initially quite hard as I had to navigate various groups including developers, QA teams, admin teams, and the main AWS admin controller while also developing with Terraform. Once I established IAM groups, it became viable to manage permissions based on user groups rather than attaching policies to individual users, simplifying access control as users only receive permissions associated with their respective group like dev, QA, or tech leads, which streamlined the organizational structure while also focusing on specific repository access. On a scale of 1-10, I rate AWS CodeCommit a 9.
I can definitely recommend AWS CodeCommit, rating it eight out of ten. I am always upfront about its limitations, but if your team is heavily invested in advanced GitHub actions and extensive marketplace integrations, here is my advice: First, set up solid IAM permissions from day one. Second, don't skip on training as the CLI commands and identification are slightly different from GitHub and GitLab. Third, configure the notification system properly. Finally, consider the AWS integration advantages, as AWS CodeCommit really shines when setting up event-driven pipelines using AWS CodeCommit triggers that build automatically when commits hit specific branches.
It depends on how the entire project is set up within AWS. I would suggest using cloud-native tools, like CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CodeDeploy, for better integration and seamless delivery of code into production. I would rate the product eight out of ten.
I would rate the solution probably six out of ten. I am an architect, developer, and DevOps guy, so I do the work for the client and customers. It is off the cuff right now. It is on the cloud, but CodeCommit, as I mentioned, is now being retired by AWS. They do not allow any new customers to use it. They will allow existing ones, but it is a matter of time to migrate to GitHub and GitLab. AWS is going to probably phase it out next year or so.
I would recommend third-party tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab to those considering starting fresh since AWS CodeCommit is deprecated for new customers. Overall, I would rate AWS CodeCommit an eight out of ten.
Anyone can use the solution because AWS's documentation is very nice. Even if you know nothing about AWS CodeCommit, you can follow the documentation. We wanted something that could be pushed directly to the testing environment first and then to the production environment. I suggested that a CI/CD pipeline with CodeCommit would benefit this case because it can integrate with various development environments. I would recommend AWS CodeCommit if the requirement is CI/CD. It integrates well with the development environment and makes pushing and regulating the code easy. I will definitely use AWS CodeCommit in CI/CD processes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We can't fork online, and we can't integrate directly with Bitbucket. Also, you don't have Jira or debugging and code debugging options. Additionally, we can't add a reviewer or repository code reviewer. When we give the full request, we can't mention anyone's name to which we want to add a full request. Overall, I would rate AWS CodeCommit a seven out of ten.
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Automated notification within the AWS CodeCommit pipeline or repository was never used. Notifications were not sent to users, as accounts were simply created. Notifications might be used when you do a pull request to notify the other reviewer to review the pull request, or when you have to approve something, to send notification to the approval team. The overall review rating for this product is seven out of ten.
I have been exploring AWS WAF, VPC subnets, and Lambda lately. I worked with AWS CodeCommit about six months ago, or maybe more. The integration of AWS Identity and Access Management and AWS CodeCommit for managing access control was initially quite hard as I had to navigate various groups including developers, QA teams, admin teams, and the main AWS admin controller while also developing with Terraform. Once I established IAM groups, it became viable to manage permissions based on user groups rather than attaching policies to individual users, simplifying access control as users only receive permissions associated with their respective group like dev, QA, or tech leads, which streamlined the organizational structure while also focusing on specific repository access. On a scale of 1-10, I rate AWS CodeCommit a 9.
I can definitely recommend AWS CodeCommit, rating it eight out of ten. I am always upfront about its limitations, but if your team is heavily invested in advanced GitHub actions and extensive marketplace integrations, here is my advice: First, set up solid IAM permissions from day one. Second, don't skip on training as the CLI commands and identification are slightly different from GitHub and GitLab. Third, configure the notification system properly. Finally, consider the AWS integration advantages, as AWS CodeCommit really shines when setting up event-driven pipelines using AWS CodeCommit triggers that build automatically when commits hit specific branches.
It depends on how the entire project is set up within AWS. I would suggest using cloud-native tools, like CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CodeDeploy, for better integration and seamless delivery of code into production. I would rate the product eight out of ten.
I would rate the solution probably six out of ten. I am an architect, developer, and DevOps guy, so I do the work for the client and customers. It is off the cuff right now. It is on the cloud, but CodeCommit, as I mentioned, is now being retired by AWS. They do not allow any new customers to use it. They will allow existing ones, but it is a matter of time to migrate to GitHub and GitLab. AWS is going to probably phase it out next year or so.
I would recommend third-party tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab to those considering starting fresh since AWS CodeCommit is deprecated for new customers. Overall, I would rate AWS CodeCommit an eight out of ten.
Anyone can use the solution because AWS's documentation is very nice. Even if you know nothing about AWS CodeCommit, you can follow the documentation. We wanted something that could be pushed directly to the testing environment first and then to the production environment. I suggested that a CI/CD pipeline with CodeCommit would benefit this case because it can integrate with various development environments. I would recommend AWS CodeCommit if the requirement is CI/CD. It integrates well with the development environment and makes pushing and regulating the code easy. I will definitely use AWS CodeCommit in CI/CD processes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
We can't fork online, and we can't integrate directly with Bitbucket. Also, you don't have Jira or debugging and code debugging options. Additionally, we can't add a reviewer or repository code reviewer. When we give the full request, we can't mention anyone's name to which we want to add a full request. Overall, I would rate AWS CodeCommit a seven out of ten.