TeamViewer Reviews

We primarily use the solution for remote access for foreign Windows devices.

The real-time access has been excellent. 

It's easy to initially set up.

The product is very stable. Its performance is good. 

It is a scalable product.

The solution can be customized. 

It would be very helpful if they could provide a manual for the installation process and describe more of their features. They don't seem to provide that right now. 

We've been using the solution for less than a year. It's been around eight months. 

The stability of the solution is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It has been reliable. Of the few times I've used it, I didn't have any issues. 

The solution is scalable. It supports many devices. 

There might be 120 users of the solution at this point. 

I haven't dealt with support very often. They have a contact page to reach them if you need assistance.

Positive

We use the solution once in a while. It's not something I use on a daily because we have other tools like Zoom or like Google Meet.

We don't really use any other remote access products.

The implementation process is simple. It's not overly complex or difficult. 

It was basically just downloading the solution. It doesn't take very long. 

I don't have any visibility of the cost of the solution. It's not an aspect I deal with directly.

TeamViewer is a good system for organizations in general - depending on their customer needs. Users, however, can customize it to what works best for them.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

TeamViewer can be used for remote accessing computer systems.

The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is user-friendliness.

I have been using TeamViewer for approximately five years.

We have 200 people in my company, but not all of them are using TeamViewer. We do not have plans to increase usage.

The support could improve their speed.

I rate the support from TeamViewer a three out of ten.

The initial setup of TeamViewer is straightforward. It took us approximately two weeks to deploy.

We have a team of four that does the implementation of TeamViewer in-house.

I would recommend this solution to others. It is a good solution.

I rate TeamViewer a seven out of ten.

Basically, the solution is being used in order for the IT department to assist me in any problem I have with my computer. It’s for them to have remote access.

It doesn't take any effort for me to fix something that I can’t. I can just call IT and they can just connect and take over the control of my computer and fix it for me, and that’s it.

The implementation process is simple.

It's pretty limited on the options they have. I'm pretty sure they can expand the program a bit and have some more options.

If they, for example, access your computer, I’d like them to be able to diagnose and find any other issues on the computer when they are on there for something else.

The connection and reconnection sometimes lag and can cause problems. They need to look into that. If they can work on the pause button to make it easier to start and stop without lagging, it would be ideal.

I’ve been using the solution for approximately two years.

When we actually pause the connection for a little bit, then we have some problems reconnecting or taking control again. The stability is a bit of an issue.

The scalability has been okay. We haven’t seen any issues there.

We have 200 people using the solution right now.

I’ve never dealt with technical support in the past. I can’t speak to how they would be if someone needs help.

The initial setup is very straightforward. It’s not overly complex or difficult.

The solution may be free to use. However, I’m not 100% sure on this.

I am a customer and end-user.

I’m not 100% sure which version of the solution we’re on.

The solution is mostly on-premises. However, we do use it on the cloud as well.

I’d advise users to go for it and try it out. It saves time for IT, allowing them to remote in from wherever they are. They don’t have to come to you. It makes troubleshooting simple.

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

It's a remote access solution. We use it for conferences, meetings, and communication. 

It works just like other communications tools. It also integrates well with Office 365 and Outlook, et cetera.

The performance is good. 

It's got a lot of resources for users. 

The product is easy to install. 

We've found the scalability to be good.

The performance could always be better. 

I've been using the solution for three years now. It's been a while. 

The performance and stability are good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

It's a scalable product. We haven't had any issues with this aspect of the solution as well. 

We have 6,000 people using the solution right now. We do have plans to increase usage. 

We've used technical support. We've been quite happy with their capabilities. 

We did not previously use a different solution. 

The installation process is simple and straightforward. it's not overly complex or difficult. 

I'm not sure if we used a consultant or integrator or not. 

I can't speak to the exact cost of the product. I'm not sure how the licensing process works. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. 

I would rate the product seven out of ten. 

TeamViewer allows the capture of the screens of the colleagues on the network.

For example, when the user works with his screen for a process and encounters a problem, he informs us or reaches out on WhatsApp. We get control of his screen and try to understand the problem and then try to solve the problem.

Without going to the actual user or colleague, I can access his screen. This is the value of the solution for me.

It is quite simple to set up.

It is stable. 

Voice communication and screen communication or face-to-face communication could be improved. The screen should be something like Zoom when I want to talk with my counterpart. I want to communicate with my counterpart while also seeing the screen.

I've used the solution for three years. 

The solution is stable. It is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. 

We have 13 licenses. For the time being, the solution is fine and we do not plan to increase usage.  

I've never used technical support from TeamViewer. 

Sometimes we use AnyDesk. However, it gets disconnected suddenly. TeamViewer is very good. It doesn't happen. 

The solution is easy to set up and quick to deploy. You can have it up and running in one day. 

We have three to five people in the IT department that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. They are IT technicians.

I don't handle the licensing. I can't speak to the costs. However, my understanding is that it is reasonably priced. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd rate the product nine out of ten. 

I would recommend the solution to others. 

TeamViewer allows administrators to access computers remotely. 

The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ability for administrators to lock the remote systems, simple connections, and easy login access.

TeamViewer could improve by having a cloud version. Having the solution on the system could cause some cyber security concerns with data.

In a feature update, if there was a bios install option it would be helpful. This feature would allow TeamViewer to connect in the background to the internet and then we can switch on the computer, which would be very helpful.

I have been using TeamViewer for approximately 20 years.

TeamViewer is stable.

I rate the scalability of TeamViewer a nine out of ten.

I did not use the support from TeamViewer.

I have used previously Microsoft Quick Assist, and it was very fast and has high availability. I preferred it to TeamViewer because you don't need to download anything separately, it comes with Microsoft Windows, you can access it quickly, and it's encrypted so you can easily access those without having security concerns.

The initial setup of TeamViewer is straightforward and basic.

TeamViewer has the base option for remote access in the market.

I rate TeamViewer an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for remote access. We have been using TeamViewer for gaining access to the other systems.

TeamViewer can be used for gaining access to another system. By having the remote ID of their system we can completely access their system from TeamViewer. Mostly we have been using it for that purpose only.

It is very easy to check other solutions. 

It's very easy to learn how to use it, including the process and everything about it.

The solution is scalable. 

It's a straightforward setup.

The product can sometimes crash. The stability could be better.

Technical support could be improved.

I've been using the solution for a year or two.

The solution is mostly stable, although it sometimes crashes. 

I'd rate the scalability at a seven out of ten. Sometimes I have faced issues with adapting, to gaining a new acquisition. I haven't been using the latest version, so it might be improved. Also, it is now cloud-based. It may have grown in scalability.

We have 20 to 25 users on the solution. 

We've used technical support once or twice. I have faced issues with the TeamViewer application. I have tried contacting the technical support, however, on the first attempt, I didn't get any response so I had to call and call them again. They said that there have been some errors going on with their server and they were affected at that time. They have increased rates. For most users, it means, hopefully, that they have to get more technical support. Their support team might also be increased.

We have some people who are using AnyDesk. Most of the people in our company are using this. It's likely 100 to 150 people. TeamViewer gave us issues, which is why we switched to AnyDesk.

The product is really straightforward and completely easy to implement.

It took roughly two months to set up and deploy.

We have 14 engineers, however, we only need maybe three for deployment and maintenance. 

We were able to handle the initial setup ourselves. 

I am using the free version only. I've never had to buy their license.

I haven't updated it to the latest version.

Without having tried the latest version, I wouldn't recommend their solution completely. However, it is good. If on the current version it is still good to use, then I would recommend it completely to the others. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I mostly use it for remote access to my three computers. I also use it for a pilot when I'm speaking to my inspectors out in the field.

It is a subscription, so we have the latest version.

The pilot feature is what stands out the most. I love the ability to use the pilot feature for remote inspections. The augmented portion of the software comes in handy when I have to assist my inspectors. They use the app in the field, and they show me what they're seeing through their phones.

Its pricing can be improved. It would be nice if it is cheaper.

I can use up to three computers, but sometimes I have four. So, it would be nice to have at least four computers.

There is a limitation on the number of participants you can have in a meeting. That's the only reason I use Zoom in addition to this.

I have been using it for a year. I use it every day.

It is stable.

There is a limit on the number of people who can attend a meeting. Currently, I use Zoom for our pre-construction meetings because I can have up to 25 people. I would like to use TeamViewer, but I can't have everybody participate at the same time. Zoom allows me to have more people.

I used them once when I was trying to get my prescription renewed. Before TeamViewer, they had Blizz. When they phased Blizz out to something else, there was an issue in transferring or going from one subscription to another, but we got through it.

Before TeamViewer, they had Blizz. I was using Blizz.

It was pretty easy.

It would be nice if it is cheaper.

My advice would be to have a deep pocket. Other than that, it is a great product.

I would rate TeamViewer a 10 out of 10.