Oracle ZFS Reviews

Name: Oracle ZFS
Brand: Oracle
Rating: 4.5 (6 reviews)

4.5 out of 5

6 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is Oracle ZFS?

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance delivers leading performance and superior efficiency in enterprise-class network-attached storage (NAS) environments, accelerating business functions, and reducing complexity. This first application-engineered storage system provides unique integration points with Oracle Database which automate storage tuning and data lifecycle management, reduce capacity requirements, and lower TCO.

Get the File System Software Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Oracle ZFS, Amazon FSx, Quantum StorNext and more!

Oracle ZFS is the #5 ranked solution in top File System Software solutions. PeerSpot users give Oracle ZFS an average rating of 9.0 out of 10. Oracle ZFS is most commonly compared to Amazon FSx: Oracle ZFS vs Amazon FSx. Oracle ZFS is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 68% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 13% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

July 2025

Get the category report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Featured Oracle ZFS reviews

Rajesh Sudini

Associate Director at Optum

The replication capability and data security have been the most valuable features When retrieving data from the replication of remote sites, it does not give you immediate results. The RPO and RTO rates could be improved. We have been using this solution for three and a half years. This is a…

Read full review

David Kotey

IT Infrastructure Manager at National Investment Bank

Everything in Oracle ZFS is great and it's easy to use, making it very user-friendly. I have used Oracle ZFS Snapshot and Rollback capabilities, and everything has worked well. The Snapshot and Rollback features in Oracle ZFS are awesome - that's one word to describe it. It's cool, very easy, and stress-free. Without doing benchmarks with other products, I can rate data compression in Oracle ZFS about an eight or nine out of ten, and I have noticed some deduplication and indexing features. Regarding how Oracle ZFS handles demanding workloads, such as online transaction processing and complex query executions, most of these aspects depend on your configuration setup. For instance, if you are using virtualization and have enterprise solutions on these servers, you can route or place database servers on SSDs or flash disks to enable better throughput from these systems. You can run your operating system on flash disks, or alternatively save ordinary data on SATA disks, depending on where you place your valuable data. The structure will affect performance, so if you plan it properly, you can achieve the best performance, even if the systems are aging or if you don't have the compute power, you can still balance it.

Read full review

Carlo Ayars

Owner at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

The question is, can it do a lot better? So for example, it could run an airline, and all the computer systems, but can it do it as effectively and efficiently as it could on other systems? No. That's where you start hitting things like you could store library congress on it 50 times, but does that mean that it's usable? If you want to find a book, do you want to wait a minute to get your results back or would you rather get your results back in two seconds? ZFS can always get the job done and it's reliable but it's just not always fast enough, and that's the main problem with it. ZFS is great for just mass storage, but if you're trying to make fast storage – something like a SAN-type delivery network where you wanted to do any type of RAM disc over the network – it falls flat. ZFS does not do that. It is kind of limiting. For companies or organizations using Kubernetes, multiple Docker instances, or the spin-up machines needed to handle the workload need quick media just for the host itself to be able to run things quickly, but ZFS does not do that. What's important these days is, as you run stuff as a cluster, you want to be able to replicate from one cluster to another, whether that's done in the background or is done in near real-time. ZFS just does not do anything of that nature. You have to use a third-party product or Ceph storage, which we use also. So that's why it's limiting from that standpoint.

Read full review

Oracle ZFS mindshare

As of July 2025, the mindshare of Oracle ZFS in the File System Software category stands at 8.9%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File System Software

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Jul 31, 2025

Valuable Features

Users highlight Oracle ZFS for its high performance, strong integration capabilities, and efficient data compression. Many appreciate the robust scalability and easy management features. The hybrid storage pooling and excellent support for different workloads are also frequently mentioned. Furthermore, users value Oracle ZFS' superior data protection and straightforward deployment.

"It is not necessarily for the fastest storage or cluster storage, but just for pure storage, it's really hard to beat. It's just been around as long as anything else."
"The replication capability and data security have been the most valuable features."
"Oracle ZFS is very fast and it is efficient. It has outperformed any hardware array controller that I've ever come across. With Oracle ZFS on my NAS, which is running five, four terabyte drives, when I've had a drive failure and changed one out, it'll rebuild that array in two hours, or maybe less. When you think you're rebuilding almost four terabytes of data redundancy, that's pretty good using an old AMD Turion hardware, that's nothing to complain about."

Room for Improvement

Some users feel Oracle ZFS could improve its integration with third-party applications and its administrative management tools. Others mention challenges with scalability and performance under heavy loads. Additionally, there are mentions of the need for enhanced support for newer protocols and technologies. Users would also like to see more detailed documentation and streamlined updates for a better overall experience.

"ZFS is great for just mass storage, but if you're trying to make fast storage – something like a SAN-type delivery network where you wanted to do any type of RAM disc over the network – it falls flat. ZFS does not do that. It is kind of limiting."
"When retrieving data from the replication of remote sites, it does not give you immediate results. The RPO and RTO rates could be improved."
"Oracle ZFS does what I've asked it to do, and it has done it very efficiently. The only time I'm running into issues is with Proxmox. If I run ZFS drives, I find my RAM usage is very high. However, I don't have that problem with the TrueNAS system, where I'm running an old N36 Turion with four gigabytes of RAM, and that's running 24/7. There have been no issues with such a low-powered environment there, it works fine, but with Proxmox it seems to go slow."

ROI

Users have reported significant cost savings and efficiency gains with Oracle ZFS, highlighting its high speed and reliability. They cite improved data management and reduced operational expenses. Additionally, IT departments have noticed better performance, quicker backups, and enhanced scalability, contributing to a positive impact on return on investment.

Pricing

Oracle ZFS offers robust, high-performance storage solutions often praised for their scalability and efficiency. Pricing is typically considered premium, reflecting its advanced capabilities. Users appreciate its reliability and superior data management features. Though initial costs may be high, many find long-term value due to its low operational expenses and minimal downtime.

Popular Use Cases

Oracle ZFS is primarily used for high-performance storage solutions in enterprises, supporting virtualization, databases, and large-scale data environments. Users frequently mention its robust performance, scalability, and integration with Oracle environments. It is commonly utilized for backup and recovery, particularly in virtualized and database contexts. Administrators appreciate its ease of management and efficient data compression capabilities, which enhance storage utilization and performance for critical applications.

Service and Support

Users find Oracle ZFS customer service responsive and knowledgeable. They appreciate quick issue resolution and effective support, making them feel satisfied. However, a few note longer response times in some cases. They commend the support team for its professionalism and readiness to assist in difficult situations. Oracle ZFS support is largely helpful, offering clear guidance and detailed information during interaction. Some users mention appreciating the availability of extensive documentation for troubleshooting.

Deployment

Users find Oracle ZFS's initial setup straightforward and user-friendly. They report that preparation is quick and uncomplicated with minimal technical challenges. Most users appreciate the comprehensive documentation available, which aids in the setup process. Feedback also highlights that the system's flexibility allows for easy customization to fit various requirements. Some users mention encountering minor issues, but these are typically resolved quickly without significant disruption.

Scalability

Users find Oracle ZFS highly scalable, supporting rapid data growth and large-scale storage demands efficiently. It provides robust support for expanding storage pools and handling extensive workloads. Users appreciate its flexibility in managing increasing amounts of data and seamless integration with existing systems. They highlight its capability to maintain performance levels as storage needs grow, making it a reliable choice for large enterprises.

Stability

Users find Oracle ZFS to be extremely stable, highlighting its reliability during extensive operations. They appreciate its robust performance under heavy workloads and its minimal downtime. Users also mention that Oracle ZFS consistently delivers high availability and efficiently handles large-scale data storage needs.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our File System Software Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Educational Organization

10%

University

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Media Company

Construction Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Mining And Metals Company

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Pharma/Biotech Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Renewables & Environment Company

Logistics Company

Legal Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Compare Oracle ZFS with alternative products

Learn more about Oracle ZFS

Oracle ZFS was previously known as ZFS.

Oracle ZFS customers

Specialized Bicycle Components Inc., Hospital AlemÊo Oswaldo Cruz, DB Schenker Rail, Asia Commercial Bank, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, Ricoh Company Ltd., CyberSolutions Inc., NARA INSTITUTE of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, SunGard Availability Services, B&H PhotoVideo,