NetIQ Access Manager Reviews

We work with farmer federations. We primarily use the solution for authentication and single sign-on capabilities.

The single sign-on feature is excellent. I'm going to configure it as a module for the advanced authentication from NetIQ to the Access Management so that we can use multi-factor authentication.

Occasionally, it's very difficult to get the solution running. There's no administration behavior of the application at a platform level.

I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance.

We've been using the solution for two years now. It hasn't been too long at this point.

The stability is fine. We don't deal with any bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

We are about to change our infrastructure architecture. Therefore, in our case, it's not yet scalable.

We have about 300 people that use the solution in our organization.

Technical support is okay. Occasionally, it takes them a while to get back to you. However, once you are in contact, the support is great. They answer your questions and solve your problems. For the most part, we're satisfied with the level of service provided. 

The implementation is different every time. However, that said, if you know what to do, it's pretty straightforward and you can figure it out pretty easily.

Everything was done in-house. We didn't need the assistance of an integrator or consultant.

I'm new to this product. Therefore, I don't have any knowledge of the pricing or licensing. It's not an aspect of the solution I handle.

The was our first choice. We did not evaluate other options.

We're a partner. We have a business relationship with the product.

I would recommend the solution.

I would rate the solution seven out of ten overall.

Our primary use cases include creating the security patch, control over access, simplifying the control of the organization's access to infrastructureת and obligation services. We provide account security access to profile users with different obligations for information and services to the company.

The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database.

In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device.

I have been using NetIQ Access Manager for about three years.

In terms of stability, it Is very good. The client is very satisfied with the stability of the solution.

The scalability is not great. We have approximately 300 users using this solution.

Micro Focus' technical support is very good.

The initial setup and implementation are very easy. It takes between two weeks and 20 days.

Before going with NetIQ Access Manager, the other option we evaluated was Microsoft Identity Manager. We checked the open source IDM Solution.

The main differences between the Micro Focus solution and Microsoft are cost, simplicity, implementation, and operations. The Microsoft is very expensive, whereas NetIQ Access Manager is much lower in price in comparison.

I would recommend NetIQ Access Manager. It is a very, very good alternative to Microsoft. Micro Focus is very big and offers good technical services.

The solution is very good. It is fast and simple to operate and has very good production time to market.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give NetIQ Access Manager an eight. Learning this product takes time and effort so the training process is very time consuming.