Loadbalancer.org Pros
The features I find valuable in this solution are the ease of managing the logs on the WAFs, the ease to identify break-in attempts into the network, the front-end firewall, and a more specific firewall.
View full review »MO
reviewer1788060
Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It's pretty much a Swiss Army knife for managing all the load balancing techniques.
View full review »The performance is good.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
March 2023

Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org, HAProxy, F5 and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: March 2023.
687,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PR
PandiyanRegunathan
Ifra Texture Specialist at kyndryl
The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful.
View full review »RB
RichardBRUN
Consultant at Altran
I found scalability in Loadbalancer.org valuable.
View full review »AM
Artem Mikryukov
System Engeneer at CROC
Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix.
View full review »WM
Walid Mouamar
Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Loadbalancer is easy to use. It performs well, with low latency.
View full review »The support we have received from Loadbalancer.org has been good.
View full review »I like the different ways to balance the chart.
View full review »Loadbalancer.org Cons
You can run into an issue when one engineer passes the case over to another engineer after their shift and they don't know what the first engineer worked on up to that point.
View full review »MO
reviewer1788060
Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The solution can be a bit pricey.
View full review »I'd like to see scalability improved; it can be costly.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
March 2023

Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org, HAProxy, F5 and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: March 2023.
687,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PR
PandiyanRegunathan
Ifra Texture Specialist at kyndryl
The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging.
The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging.
View full review »RB
RichardBRUN
Consultant at Altran
An area for improvement in Loadbalancer.org is that sometimes it works fine, but sometimes, it has issues. The setup for Loadbalancer.org is also complex, so that's another area for improvement.
View full review »AM
Artem Mikryukov
System Engeneer at CROC
Loadbalancer.org's complexity could be reduced.
View full review »WM
Walid Mouamar
Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like it if Loadbalancer had the ability to make rules for specific shared bots.
View full review »The interface from Loadbalancer.org should be improved.
View full review »Loadbalancer is expensive. At Globo, it is probably the most expensive tool we use. Annually, we are paying more than $1 million.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
March 2023

Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org, HAProxy, F5 and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: March 2023.
687,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.