

LoadBalancer Enterprise and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway compete in the load balancing market. Based on the data comparisons, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has the upper hand due to its feature-rich environment and integration capabilities.
Features: LoadBalancer Enterprise is highly praised for its reliability, ease of use, and effective SSL termination capabilities, ensuring even traffic distribution and high service availability. It is known for its straightforward installation and simple management, making it accessible for less experienced team members. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, on the other hand, is noted for its comprehensive feature set, including a web application firewall (WAF) and the ability to seamlessly integrate with other Azure services. Its scalability and automatic routing capabilities are particularly valued by users.
Room for Improvement: LoadBalancer Enterprise users seek simplified configuration, easier access to graphing data, and enhanced security features. The complexity of the solution can be a challenge for first-time users, and a demand exists for more flexible pricing options. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve its integration and flexibility, particularly in scaling. Enhancements in support and simpler configuration of security features are also suggested by users, along with faster feature rollouts and better documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadBalancer Enterprise supports primarily on-premises and private cloud environments, with users expressing satisfaction with its superior customer support, noting the technical team's responsiveness and knowledge. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers broader deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Although Azure's support is competent, users occasionally experience delays and miss the immediacy of resolution compared to LoadBalancer Enterprise's service.
Pricing and ROI: LoadBalancer Enterprise is generally perceived as a good value for its affordability and straightforward pricing. It offers unlimited licenses and is seen as cost-effective compared to competitors. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway adopts a pay-as-you-go model that suits scalable needs but tends to be more expensive. While its effectiveness is recognized for medium to large-scale projects, users must consider the cost against benefits, as LoadBalancer Enterprise impacts operational costs less measurably, whereas Azure's scalability contributes to strategic growth.
There are very lesser downtimes in terms of my overall data, including software deployment, development, and testing cycles.
One of the reasons why we went for LoadBalancer Enterprise is because of losing revenue when services are not available.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
If we can use a shared resource, then the return on investment is really nice.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
I can expect a response within fifteen to twenty minutes after I put in a ticket to release the license.
They respond immediately when we do reach out.
I would rate LoadBalancer Enterprise's customer support at nine out of ten.
I would say they provide the best support for Application Gateway because they own the product, so their support is top-notch.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
I would rate Microsoft support as good because they have a very skilled technical support team in the background
LoadBalancer Enterprise is easy to scale, maintain, and modify, which makes adding or removing servers a simple process.
LoadBalancer Enterprise ensures that it distributes the load properly so that the system is not broken.
I rate the scalability of LoadBalancer Enterprise as excellent since it adapts perfectly to increased traffic volume or the addition of new applications.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
It has the autoscaling feature, so there is not much concern around performance; it can scale significantly.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a scalable solution.
The regular health checks that LoadBalancer Enterprise performs using regular Jenkins jobs utilize all the functionalities of LoadBalancer Enterprise to make sure everything is working perfectly according to my design.
In 90% to 99% of cases, I can say it is seamless.
LoadBalancer Enterprise is stable.
We have been using it for the past two to three years, and there have been good results with no problems so far.
The stability is good, and except for a few instances, I don't see the non-availability of Azure Cloud services.
If advanced features such as iRules are required, and complete detailed WAF monitoring is desired along with policies that can be learned and then implemented afterwards as you have in F5, then LoadBalancer Enterprise lacks these capabilities.
Documentation needs improvement because having information is essential for working with advanced configurations.
LoadBalancer Enterprise could work more on content caching by bypassing the back-end server more often and making the cache more accessible so that it gives better and more robust results.
One feature I mentioned is the support for non-HTTPS protocols such as TCP, which could allow one endpoint for all kinds of protocols.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
In future releases of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would like to see more AI functionalities and a better dashboard as well as some customizations.
The setup cost is cheap and licensing is also reasonably priced.
Regarding the pricing of LoadBalancer Enterprise, I only pay for a license, and whatever license I use doesn't require the same CAPEX investment as physical hardware.
The cost of LoadBalancer Enterprise is better and a bit cheaper compared to other products.
We would prefer to have it cheaper, but it is still expensive.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Now, we achieve about 99% availability across all servers thanks to the health check feature in the load balancer.
LoadBalancer Enterprise simulates production traffic profiles by using a realistic traffic generator that models different requests and transaction mixes such as reads and writes, leveraging replay traffic from sanitized production traces whenever possible.
LoadBalancer Enterprise has impacted my organization positively by making our applications and services available to all users across the globe.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
The gateway's Web Application Firewall feature enhances security as it is the first entry point to your network from the outside world.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| LoadBalancer Enterprise | 4.9% |
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 4.9% |
| Other | 90.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a reliable, high-availability solution designed for efficient load distribution and a user-friendly interface, catering to teams with foundational network expertise.
LoadBalancer Enterprise enhances network performance through effective traffic routing, monitoring, and high availability. Users benefit from SSL termination with SNI and Layer 7 load balancing, ensuring seamless connections with reduced complexity compared to alternatives. While known for its user-friendly approach, improvements in configuration simplicity, scalable hardware upgrades, and enhanced notification systems are often discussed for better user experience. Additional demands include HTTP API access, automated configuration backups, DNS load balancing, and enhanced graphing data capabilities. Competitive pricing and heightened security for sensitive data are frequently requested. Interface refresh issues and Microsoft compatibility are noted among users, who deploy it for SSL/HTTP traffic management, redundancy, failover capabilities, web filtering, and cloud migration support.
What are LoadBalancer Enterprise's key features?LoadBalancer Enterprise is implemented across industries for managing SSL/HTTP traffic, enhancing network reliability, and providing failover capabilities. It supports web filtering, balances Exchange and application servers, facilitates cloud migration, and manages multiple ISP lines for optimal traffic distribution across web applications and services, including SIP provisioning. Industries also use it for enhancing security with web application firewalls, DNS sharing, and application publishing.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers advanced traffic management and security features for web applications. It includes built-in rules, Layer 7 control, autoscaling, and integration options, providing flexibility and security for managing application traffic efficiently.
Azure Application Gateway is utilized by organizations for securing and managing web traffic with its comprehensive web application firewall, load balancing capabilities, and Layer 7 firewall rules. Known for its ease of setup and integration, the platform facilitates external application access and deploys secure services. While it enhances security with customized configurations, users note areas for improvement such as configuration complexity, pricing, third-party tool integration, and automation. Addressing these aspects can improve user experience and performance.
What are the key features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Application Gateway to protect sensitive data and manage significant web traffic. Its application deployment support and security capabilities make it suitable for businesses needing to ensure secure data exchange and reliable access to online services.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.