Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

What is IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe?

IBM FlashSystem 9100 combines the performance of flash and Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) end-to-end with the reliability and innovation of IBM FlashCore technology and the rich features of IBM Spectrum Virtualize - all in a powerful 2U enterprise-class storage system. Providing intensive data driven multicloud storage capacity, FlashSystem 9100 is deeply integrated with the software defined capabilities of IBM Spectrum Storage allowing you to easily add in the multicloud solutions that best support your business.

Get the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe, Dell PowerStore, Pure Storage FlashArray and more!
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is the #8 ranked solution in best NVMe All-Flash Arrays and #18 ranked solution in best All-Flash Storage Arrays. PeerSpot users give IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is most commonly compared to Dell PowerStore: IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Dell PowerStore. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 48% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 9% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Featured IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe reviews

Read more reviews

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe mindshare

Product category:
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
As of December 2025, the mindshare of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category stands at 1.4%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe1.4%
Dell PowerStore20.5%
NetApp AFF17.0%
Other61.1%
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

PeerResearch reports based on IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryNVMe All-Flash Storage ArraysDec 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Dell PowerStoreDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs NetApp AFFDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Dell PowerMaxDec 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Dell PowerStore4.420.5%96%154 interviewsAdd to research
Pure Storage FlashArray4.5N/A99%211 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe excels with speed, high performance, and reliability. Its unique FlashCore modules enhance architecture with computational capability. Users value easy administration via GUI or CLI and its robust maintenance cycle. The architecture supports high IOPS, efficient compression, and snapshot functionality. Its user-friendly UI and cost-effectiveness appeal to many. NVMe flash modules and cloud enablement offer significant advantages, making FlashSystem 9100 a favored choice for high-traffic and data-intensive environments.
  • "The features I find most valuable include its use for storage and performance."
  • "The FlashCore modules support more value to the architecture due to their unique characteristics."
  • "The storage serves the virtual environment. Most of our applications run in the virtual environment, and it serves nearly 30% of the bank's capacity."

Room for Improvement

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe requires improvements in pricing, replication functionality, and inclusion of file systems. More ports and better connectivity options are needed. Deduplication and compression features need enhancement. Management and support could be more efficient, while volume-based encryption and software improvements are necessary. Users find the architecture complex, scalability limited, and wish for better integration and security against ransomware. Enhanced NVMe extension and affordable access are also desired.
  • "The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best."
  • "The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best."
  • "In the FlashSystem 5200, there were only four ports of 32 fiber channels for the architecture. This has been resolved in the new generation."

ROI

Users find ROI from IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe to be significant, with value for money in controlling failures. It provides peace of mind, though some report support issues. Data reduction technology enhances storage cost efficiency through advanced compression on each disk. This high-speed process makes it cost-efficient. Investment return appears to occur in about three years.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers find IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe competitively priced compared to rivals like Dell and Huawei, offering reasonable options from mid to high range. It's cost-effective for large firms, though sometimes perceived as slightly expensive. A one-time payment is typical, covering licenses with included software. Support incurs additional costs, priced at $25,000 for three years. While generally affordable, high-end features and long-term maintenance may increase expenses, making it less suitable for smaller businesses.
  • "Compared to its competitors, IBM's offering is the most cost-effective."
  • "The product has an average cost."
  • "The tool's pricing is competitive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for hosting applications, databases, and enterprise storage with high IOPS, particularly in banking and ERP systems like SAP HANA. It supports virtual infrastructure, VMware clusters, and functions as backup storage. Deployed on-premises, public, or hybrid clouds through AWS, Microsoft Azure, or IBM Cloud, it handles data processing for core applications, offering durability and high-speed operations. Utilized by IT, financial, and manufacturing sectors for various storage needs.

Service and Support

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Some rate technical support highly for responsiveness and expertise, while others cite issues with slow response times and complex processes. Problems such as difficulty accessing support and additional charges are frequently mentioned. Some users express dissatisfaction with reliability and effectiveness, seeking faster and more precise solutions. Consistency in addressing critical errors and improving support mechanisms remains a concern for some.

Deployment

Users describe IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe's initial setup as simple and quick, often taking around one to two days. While the configuration can vary in complexity, many find the process straightforward with clear documentation. Some rate it very highly for ease of installation. Maintenance is manageable, aided by proactive features. Challenges can arise during data migration, but IBM offers tools to facilitate this. The interface is user-friendly, contributing to an efficient deployment process.

Scalability

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe demonstrates strong scalability, adaptable to businesses of various sizes. It supports growth through scaling up and out, with different storage capacities and configurations. Some installations manage thousands of users and numerous virtual machines. Scalability ratings range from seven to ten out of ten, and the system can reach substantial capacity depending on disk expansion. Certain limitations exist, particularly for larger companies, where cost and hardware constraints influence scaling options.

Stability

The stability of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is highly regarded. Users frequently report excellent stability, reliability, and minimal downtime during updates or maintenance. Issues are rare, with only occasional setup or migration challenges noted. Ratings generally fall between eight and ten out of ten, indicating high satisfaction. Despite isolated customer concerns about snapshots, improvements are being made, ensuring a stable experience for most.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise41
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Insurance Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Construction Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Wellness & Fitness Company
2%
Media Company
1%
Sports Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
University
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe was previously known as IBM FlashSystem 9100, FlashSystem 9100.

Related questions

  • 80
What is the best solution for an enterprise-level storage environment?
  • 47
How would you recommend selecting a compute and storage solution based on the company size?
  • 426
Does NetApp offers Capacity NVMs All-Flash Storage Arrays?
  • 21
When evaluating NVMe, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 28
Why is NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
All-Flash Storage

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
IBM FlashSystem vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
IBM FlashSystem vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
Dell PowerMax vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Dell PowerMax vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
HPE Primera vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
HPE Primera vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
Hitachi VSP E Series vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Hitachi VSP E Series vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Logo
Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe
See all alternatives
 
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Datacenter Manager at Tracker Connect3.5I use the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for storage in the IT industry. Its best aspect is performance, but compression needs improvement. Support from partners isn't great, and we didn't consider any other storage solutions before choosing IBM.
IT manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I find the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe invaluable for its unmatched speed and performance, particularly in core banking. Its data reduction capabilities enhance cost efficiency, though it could improve in scalability and built-in security against ransomware.
Microfinance at a consultancy with 11-50 employees5.0I rely on IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for enterprise storage due to its steady performance in high-traffic environments. While previously using NetApp and Dell, the main improvement needed is enhancing backend connections for storage expansion.
Information Technology Senior Administrator at Genpa4.0I utilize the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe mainly for its daily snapshot feature, though the GUI could be improved, and there should be enhanced ransomware protection. Previously, we used NetApps, which offered superior paid support.
Directors at NYCO Solutions Ltd4.5I use the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for connecting to operating systems. Its predictable four-year battery maintenance cycle stands out compared to other storage solutions. However, improving the user-friendliness of battery repair tools would be beneficial.
Produktverantwortlicher Storage und Backup at BITMARCK TECHNIK GmbH4.5We use the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for block storage in services and databases. Its consistent software across devices simplifies management. Although CPU performance can hinder upgrades, we switched from Dell EMC and Hitachi for better pricing, performance, and ease of use.
System & Information Security Section Head at Ragab Son's4.0Our company uses the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for ticket and license use cases with 500 users. We find it highly effective for IOPS warehousing, issue resolution, and reporting, though improvements are needed for IP server availability and the ZIO interface.
IT Solution Architect at Altopro4.0I'm using the IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe as primary storage for VMware clusters and backup storage for smaller configurations. It's easy to use, performs well, and offers valuable hardware compression, but management and support could be improved.