No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages vs Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Windows Server 2016 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
508th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server 2022 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
50th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

RP
CEO at Ruby Mills Ltd
Familiar platform has supported reliable on-premise file sharing and directory services
I am not currently using virtual machines, but I intend to switch over from VMware, and if I do, I may use the Shielded Virtual Machines feature. I am not using the Nano Server product, so I cannot comment on its impact on reducing server footprint in my organization. I am not working with Windows Containers for managing application deployment. I do not know about the integration capability of Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages with Microsoft Azure, as I do not use the cloud. I would give Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages a rating of eight on a scale from zero to ten.
IB
Engineer at Seer Solutionz DMCC
Modern security and hybrid cloud integration have transformed our virtualized environment
The best features are the security and the hybrid cloud integration. When we integrated this with AWS as well as on the Azure servers we migrated, it was quite smooth without any disconnectivities or issues, unlike the older versions which had such problems. The security is enhanced, and the performance makes it feel as though I am working on a modern user interface that is very fascinating, functioning without lagging in software and applications, which makes it much more robust compared to the older versions. I find the multi-layered security measures in Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages to be very secure, as Windows Defender is one of the finest anti-malware features added, which alongside TLS makes communication more secure. The encryption now uses SMB AES 256 and the TPM with UEFI Secure Boot are great features of Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages nowadays, which we are currently using. The hardware root-of-trust and firmware protection in Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages impact my data integrity through secure core protection for supported hardware. We utilize this with secure boot and TPM in a virtualized environment using VMware and Hyper-V, ensuring smooth and robust functioning without the issues faced in earlier versions.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is familiar to use, which is a positive aspect."
"I can state that I almost never see crashes or glitches in my experience."
"The security is enhanced, and the performance makes it feel as though I am working on a modern user interface that is very fascinating, functioning without lagging in software and applications, which makes it much more robust compared to the older versions."
"I see savings in time and money with Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages."
"The installation of Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages is very easy."
"With multiple layers, you are protected both internally and externally."
"Azure Arc helps with cloud integration by allowing me to integrate all Windows Server 2022 infrastructure, along with Linux systems, across on-premises, cloud environments, and provides centralized monitoring capabilities."
"I would rate the customer support for Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages a ten because they kept me updated and were always available to help."
"The biggest advantage of Windows Server for me is that it is more secure and adds security complexity to the environment."
"Azure Arc, which helps me manage servers across the cloud platform and on-premises, providing the best features to work with this platform."
 

Cons

"I would not agree that Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages is 99% stable and reliable."
"I think there should be a lesser number of patches, as every time the system is patched, the vulnerabilities that I scan always show some vulnerabilities."
"Areas for improvement in Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages include the integration of multi-factor authentication directly in the server."
"I do not see any return on investment from Windows Server, and I do not see that it is saving me time or money."
"Microsoft support is not good. Sometimes we receive a solution before we implement it."
"Sometimes some processes become stuck, so I have to log in to the server and resolve the issue."
"I see that Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages should be more rigid in its core itself."
"The performance part of Windows Server 2022 can be improved further because, compared to cloud solutions, its performance lags if it is an in-house server that you have installed."
"Microsoft needs to act faster. They have to merge the level of support to solve problems at once."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages is reasonable in price, and I think the license is acceptable.
What needs improvement with Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
I am not certain what improvements could be made to Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages, but perhaps some built-in security features could help. Additional securi...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
I work for a company that supports a ServiceNow platform integrated with other platforms, so I cannot specify whether I am a user, partner, integrator, or consultant for Microsoft. Our client use c...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages?
I would say the license for Windows Server 2022 is slightly expensive compared to others in the market.
What needs improvement with Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages?
The performance part of Windows Server 2022 can be improved further because, compared to cloud solutions, its performance lags if it is an in-house server that you have installed. The scalability a...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages?
I started using Windows Server 2022 in my role to manage a team that works on front-end technologies which is hosted on either Linux or Windows, but my focus is on the front end.We are using Window...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages vs. Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.