TIBCO ActiveMatrix vs WebOTX comparison

TIBCO and NEC are both solutions in the Application Server category. TIBCO is ranked #16, while NEC is ranked #15. TIBCO holds a 0.7% mindshare in AppS, compared to NEC’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix

203 Views
97 Comparison Views

WebOTX

218 Views
122 Comparison Views

TIBCO ActiveMatrix

WebOTX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TIBCO ActiveMatrix and WebOTX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO ActiveMatrix

Ranking in Application Server

16th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SOA Governance (7th)

WebOTX

Ranking in Application Server

15th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (24th), Application Infrastructure (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WebOTX is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WebOTX	0.9%
TIBCO ActiveMatrix	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Application Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

Oracle SOA Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix

Compared 61% of the time

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix

Compared 39% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Competitors

Oracle WebLogic Server vs WebOTX

Compared 50% of the time

IBM BPM vs WebOTX

Compared 50% of the time

More WebOTX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

August 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

August 2025

Download WebOTX product report

Also Known As

ActiveMatrix

No data available

Overview

TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture.

TIBCO

WebOTX is designed to handle the arrival of the cloud computing age, SaaS, and virtualization. Based on leading-edge technologies and proven results, WebOTX helps set up systems that are always available, are adaptable to change, and utilize leading-edge technologies to achieve a new kind of business and new way of living.

NEC

Sample Customers

Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA)

Yokohama City, Nagasaki City

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.