No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

TeamViewer ONE vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

TeamViewer ONE
Ranking in Patch Management
19th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (22nd), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Ranking in Patch Management
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (10th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 2.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management2.2%
TeamViewer ONE1.0%
Other96.8%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Nitesh Ranjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.
Chethan Gowda - PeerSpot reviewer
Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS
Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers
Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is great for remote support; it works well, we can transfer files, or we can share the system with more than one person at the same time, it is easy to set up, the solution is stable and secure, and we haven't had an issue with the pricing."
"The pricing of the solution is very reasonable."
"I like that we can get a remote desktop view and even full control over remote machines for communication and troubleshooting, and we can make calls or chat over the applications, which are all quite helpful."
"There are some great features."
"TeamViewer Remote Management is very easy and very good for remote work."
"I use the product for remote access. We are IT service providers. In case anybody has problems with their computer, we use the solution to check them."
"If you want to do remote troubleshooting, it's a good idea to utilize TeamViewer."
"Transferring files and viewing data work well with TeamViewer Remote Management."
"Overall, I am quite happy with Tenable.io."
"The ease of use, the automated scanning facility, and their good support mechanism are all valuable."
"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable, and it has a diverse checklist when it comes to vulnerability databases."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
 

Cons

"There have been some delays in the past due to unstable internet connection."
"The price for the license could be improved, as well as the setup could be easier."
"Using the solution’s remote connection causes some lagging issues."
"I have contacted customer service and support a couple of times, but it was not good."
"The connectivity could improve."
"I want TeamViewer Remote Management to incorporate more integrations."
"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."
"VPN connection is an area with shortcomings that need improvement in the solution."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"The response times from the customer service and support team could be improved."
"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"The solution must provide penetration testing."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."
"Addition services could be lower priced."
"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."
"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."
"The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive. The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive."
"I have used the free version of the solution."
"The solution's license is expensive."
"It is a licensed product."
"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."
"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"The solution is not too expensive."
"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."
"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."
"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...
What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to...
What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?
I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
In my opinion, I would like to see additional functions and improvements. Something related to AI would be a good addition.
What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
I have purchased a license directly from Tenable, so I am working directly with Tenable and not through partners. My overall review rating for Tenable Vulnerability Management is eight.
 

Also Known As

TeamViewer IoT
Tenable.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Carey Paul Honda
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer ONE vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.