Sucuri vs Web Application Scanning comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sucuri Security Logo
0 views|4 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
3,514 views|2,721 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sucuri and Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, F5 and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Domain Name System (DNS) Security Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The initial setup was very easy.""The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use.""I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server.""Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing.""It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website.""The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

More Sucuri Pros →

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities.""We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities.""The most valuable features of Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful.""The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.""The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats.""It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on.""The solution is stable.""All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

More Web Application Scanning Pros →

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection.""Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives.""It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance.""Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section.""In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there.""I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

More Sucuri Cons →

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers.""The dashboard could be more user-friendly.""I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.""The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not.""The reporting has a very limited customization capability."" Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific.""The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly.""The report customization needs to be better."

More Web Application Scanning Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I’d simply say it’s really worth it."
  • "Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."
  • "The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."
  • "It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."
  • More Sucuri Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "It follows the same licensing scheme as and Tenable. sc."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
  • " Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
  • "The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
  • More Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions are best for your needs.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The initial setup was very easy.
    Top Answer:The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.
    Top Answer:The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could… more »
    Top Answer:The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
    Top Answer:The platform's technical support services could be better.
    Top Answer:Implementing Web Application Scanning has been beneficial in identifying numerous vulnerabilities within application code. I rate its scanning capabilities in terms of user-friendliness an… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More
    Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology. Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

    Sample Customers
    The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World
    Top Industries
    Educational Organization44%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Media Company5%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Security Firm17%
    Educational Organization17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise46%
    Large Enterprise27%
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Domain Name System (DNS) Security
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, F5 and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security. Updated: May 2024.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sucuri is ranked 12th in Domain Name System (DNS) Security with 6 reviews while Web Application Scanning is ranked 24th in Application Security Tools with 14 reviews. Sucuri is rated 8.4, while Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Web Application Scanning writes "Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods". Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, SiteLock, Comodo cWatch and StackPath WAF, whereas Web Application Scanning is most compared with Acunetix, Qualys Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Fortify on Demand and SonarQube.

    We monitor all Domain Name System (DNS) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.