No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler vs WhereScape RED comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Data Virtualization (8th)
WhereScape RED
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (43rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler is designed for Data Virtualization and holds a mindshare of 3.8%, up 1.4% compared to last year.
WhereScape RED, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 1.3% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Data Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler3.8%
Denodo22.1%
SAP HANA14.5%
Other59.599999999999994%
Data Virtualization
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WhereScape RED1.3%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.7%
SSIS3.6%
Other91.4%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Use Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler?
Leave a review
reviewer1618884 - PeerSpot reviewer
BI Analyst DW Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
Quick to set up, flexible, and stable
The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Healthcare Company
11%
Insurance Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
 

Also Known As

Enterprise Enabler
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

General Electric, J.M. Huber Corporation, MASH, DermSurgery, Fisher Controls International, The Houstonian Hotel, Club & Spa, Kiodex, PDVSA, Shell
British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.