Splunk Observability Cloud vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Splunk and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Splunk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while Zenoss is ranked #77. Splunk holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 56 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

1,165 Views
351 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

690 Views
270 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and Splunk Observability Cloud are in the IT operations management and observability category. Splunk Observability Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features.

Features: Zenoss Cloud provides a holistic platform for IT monitoring with AI-driven insights, flexible deployment options, and a comprehensive discovery mechanism that utilizes standard protocols like TCP and UDP. Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time monitoring, detailed analytics, and extensive integration capabilities, with advanced data processing features for deeper insights, an intuitive dashboard creation tool, and a robust service map feature.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could enhance analytics detail, integrate more deeply with third-party tools, and improve its real-time data processing features. Splunk Observability Cloud could benefit from lowering resource demands during deployment, expanding its standard feature sets to improve customization, and enhancing ease of use for non-specialists.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, which simplifies the integration journey. Splunk Observability Cloud requires more resources for deployment but compensates with strong technical support, aiding in navigating complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud offers competitive pricing, making it attractive to organizations with budget constraints without sacrificing performance. In contrast, Splunk Observability Cloud, while more costly, provides potentially higher ROI due to its enriched functionality and superior data management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (9th), Container Management (7th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

52nd

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

39th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (30th), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (26th), Container Monitoring (10th), AIOps (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The volume it handles is very good, including the number of metrics, the volume number of traces, and more."

"The most valuable features include user time tracking and the ability to analyze application load times."

"Overall, I would recommend Splunk to anyone seeking a monitoring solution, thanks to its extensive capabilities and features."

"Splunk APM has helped us to standardize logging and monitoring procedures."

"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."

"We haven't really experienced any glitches or bugs."

"The product's deployment phase is good and very easy because it is done with OpenTelemetry for most of the parts."

"The best features in Splunk Observability Cloud are the metrics; I can see any logs or anything related to the server or services we want to monitor, and the metrics are a good function."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

Cons

"The implementation can be more user-friendly."

"There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available."

"We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny little tweaks that can be made regardless of whether it looks better or has a different flow to it than it does right now, but it works pretty well for what we use it for."

"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."

"They do not have all the features that I expect right now."

"The end-to-end visibility is lacking because Splunk cannot directly monitor network devices."

"The security could be better."

"A wide variety of logging makes log onboarding difficult."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"It is expensive."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Government

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 31% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 28% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

May 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

May 2025

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.