No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SharePoint vs TIBCO tibbr comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SharePoint
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
166
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)
TIBCO tibbr
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. SharePoint is designed for Enterprise Content Management and holds a mindshare of 11.7%, down 15.9% compared to last year.
TIBCO tibbr, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Social Software, holds 2.3% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SharePoint11.7%
Alfresco6.7%
OpenText Content Management6.3%
Other75.3%
Enterprise Content Management
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
TIBCO tibbr2.3%
Slack Business - Enterprise9.6%
Microsoft Teams6.9%
Other81.2%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ravi Raushan Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at ValueMomentum
Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured
SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.
it_user685332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable.
The API is awful. We needed to develop a batch load tool in order to send automated events to Tibber API. The current API version is not well documented, i.e. the current version of the API in the software doesn't correspond to the web-documented API. We had to imagine parameters and names. We had difficulty making it all work, as the login/SSO mechanism was not properly explained so that we could perform external logins to the API and use their features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"It is very stable."
"The SharePoint interface is adequate and also a little bit faster."
"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."
"My advice is to not hesitate; just plunge in and implement SharePoint."
"It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place."
"It has improved our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"The ability to assign an attribute to a library artifact allows the site owner to create the appropriate views based on artifact attributes (category, owner, etc.)."
"Typically the classical ROI is about seven months from full deployment, but there are a lot of benefits that we can't measure with this metric, like more dissemination of knowledge, fast internal expert finding, less internal emails, less waste of time, and better employee engagement."
"The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable."
 

Cons

"We are looking for increased functionality on SharePoint or to change to something else."
"It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."
"In general, it is a good product, but it has limited support and too much expertise required."
"Stability, even after deployment three months ago, still seems to be an issue."
"The suite is complicated to set up, complicated to maintain, complicated to work with."
"For the most part, the tool is useable, but there are many end users who still find it difficult overall."
"Setting up permissions can be overwhelming. If this can be improved it would be great."
"The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control."
"More customizable features, particularly in mobile app; better preview of document and images stored in other cloud services (like Google Drive, Dropbox and so on)."
"The API is awful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very expensive.​"
"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."
"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."
"The pricing works for us."
"The platform has medium pricing."
"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."
"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."
"The product is reasonably priced."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
896,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8925 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer with 51-200 employees
Aug 23, 2013
Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business80
Midsize Enterprise40
Large Enterprise83
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?
I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.
What needs improvement with SharePoint?
It is a little difficult to name the areas for improvements in SharePoint because I don't use it all that much. I know I can host pages on it and feel that the CMS platform, which helps create thos...
What is your primary use case for SharePoint?
SharePoint is a repository that I use primarily for collaboration and sharing resources and assets. It's a good way to collaborate, and one benefit of SharePoint is the pages you can create on it, ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
tibbr
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
InterPortPolice, Thomson Reuters, Wingstop
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: May 2026.
896,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.