No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SharePoint vs TIBCO tibbr comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SharePoint
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
166
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (3rd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)
TIBCO tibbr
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. SharePoint is designed for Enterprise Content Management and holds a mindshare of 12.1%, down 13.9% compared to last year.
TIBCO tibbr, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Social Software, holds 2.5% mindshare, up 1.3% since last year.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SharePoint12.1%
OpenText Documentum Content Management7.1%
Alfresco5.7%
Other75.1%
Enterprise Content Management
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
TIBCO tibbr2.5%
Slack Business - Enterprise9.6%
Atlassian Confluence7.1%
Other80.8%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

AnjneyBhardwaj - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate
Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing
SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.
it_user685332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable.
The API is awful. We needed to develop a batch load tool in order to send automated events to Tibber API. The current API version is not well documented, i.e. the current version of the API in the software doesn't correspond to the web-documented API. We had to imagine parameters and names. We had difficulty making it all work, as the login/SSO mechanism was not properly explained so that we could perform external logins to the API and use their features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution."
"SharePoint is smooth and easy to use for editing, updating, and uploading files."
"It has good integration with other MS products."
"Single window information sharing."
"SharePoint has streamlined our documentation management process by allowing us to automate several functions."
"It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place."
"For enterprise global collaboration, DMS, and ECM needs, this is the right platform."
"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."
"Typically the classical ROI is about seven months from full deployment, but there are a lot of benefits that we can't measure with this metric, like more dissemination of knowledge, fast internal expert finding, less internal emails, less waste of time, and better employee engagement."
"The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable."
 

Cons

"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"SharePoint is not always intuitive to use and can be overwhelming for non-tech-savvy users."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"Submitting document changes function needs to be improved."
"The limitations and boundaries must be extended."
"It tends to be unstable and slow when accessing different features."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
"The API is awful."
"More customizable features, particularly in mobile app; better preview of document and images stored in other cloud services (like Google Drive, Dropbox and so on)."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
"The pricing is competitive."
"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."
"It is very expensive.​"
"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."
"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."
"The platform has medium pricing."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8925 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer with 51-200 employees
Aug 23, 2013
Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business81
Midsize Enterprise40
Large Enterprise84
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?
I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.
What needs improvement with SharePoint?
I don't know how SharePoint can be improved because it works effectively, so I can't think of any improvement. It exists in the background, similar to Windows, where you don't think about it, but i...
What is your primary use case for SharePoint?
I have been using SharePoint for three years since I began employment at Wartsila. My main use case for SharePoint is storing documents, meeting recordings, and visiting websites created by my coll...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
tibbr
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
InterPortPolice, Thomson Reuters, Wingstop
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: October 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.