No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SharePoint vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SharePoint
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
165
Ranking in other categories
Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
55th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of SharePoint is 11.6%, down from 16.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SharePoint11.6%
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x70.3%
Other88.1%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2811600 - PeerSpot reviewer
SDE 1 at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured
SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.
Christine Ndanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at PwC
Cloud file management has improved collaboration and strengthened security across our teams
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by improving collaboration, especially through remote collaboration due to the use of a mobile application. Security posture in my organization has really improved due to the robust security features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. Furthermore, it can be accessed from anywhere, making collaboration easy. Some of the best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers are in-built Office suite, works just from any browser, cloud-based, no additional app download is required, alerts and notifications are on par, version control to view any changes made, and access control over any file or folder. The mobile application and remote collaboration features helped my team improve collaboration and also increased our security posture after we implemented Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 in all our organization departments.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"The latest versions of SharePoint are highly useful for configuring pages for managing and conveying large amounts of information, while giving users the ability to pinpoint the specific things they need with speed and accuracy."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes, and there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"Valuable features in this product are: Easy customization with MS .NET and related tools, stability, performance in a medium size environment (100-200 users), and full support by MS."
"It has an easy to distribute administration capability, and can also scale to meet a large number of future needs."
"We have generated a true document ID card, and metadata is easy to index in the research engine."
"From my perspective as a developer I would say that the most valuable features are the wide variety of data source connections, completeness of features, and strong query possibilities (customisation, SQL, MDX, macros)."
"Since I started using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, it has increased productivity, with collaboration improving from forty to fifty-five percent."
"I have seen a return on investment with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, as it has given our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and provided them the best tool to automate daily tasks, hence saving a lot of time and cost."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by greatly increasing our collaboration, especially between departmental and remote collaboration."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has improved our productivity, especially through improved collaboration, from 50 to 65%."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization with apparent savings from the top and up front, with cost reduction, productivity increase, and saved time and efforts in terms of the team's collaborations."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is a great tool that has led to faster turnaround times, less back and forth, improved customer service, more transparency into team functions, elimination of steps through processes, and reengineering, thereby saving cost and time."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by providing savings through automation, giving our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and the best way to automate daily tasks."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by making processes easier and improving productivity."
 

Cons

"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents."
"The solution should improve its integration with other project management tools."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
"In Brazil and India, I thought technical support was really poor."
"While this workflow operating system is better than others on the market, it is uncomfortable and expensive to really implement what you need."
"SharePoint Designer enables creating workflows easily. However, they produce errors at times."
"I would like to see improvements in the interface."
"Administration is still very complex."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with better documentation, especially the online documentation for new learners."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department."
"Customization can be difficult when the out-of-box functionality does not work for your needs."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved by making the user interface more intuitive and easy to customize."
"Occasionally, we would somehow have an issue with one or two users not seeing the latest document, which was a minor annoyance, but after a few minutes, we were able to get back on track due to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very easy to use, but it has some drawbacks in that typical user experience is perceived by many users as difficult or clunky."
"One way Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved is by merging two or more Sharepoint sites from different companies together if they are working together."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved in browser support, which is one of the biggest areas where Sharepoint can improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
"The data classification and search elements are cheap."
"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"The pricing works for us."
"The platform has medium pricing."
"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."
"They are about an eight in comparison to other similar products."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8925 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer with 51-200 employees
Aug 23, 2013
Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business80
Midsize Enterprise39
Large Enterprise81
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?
I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.
What needs improvement with SharePoint?
It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution. Sometimes I have to refresh pages more than with Google, but it does not charge; the page ...
What is your primary use case for SharePoint?
I create a data warehouse and establish a link between different applications. For data exchange, the vendor is Oracle.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.