We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Private Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"What I find most valuable in Zscaler Private Access is that it's a VPN. Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature."
"It is straightforward to set up."
"The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."
"I like the web filtering capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is we do not have to connect to a VPN, it is seamless. It is more convenient for us because we use one agent to cover the internet and VPN access."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
"Sometimes applications crash on some machines, and we’d like Zscaler to give us some information as to why that may have happened. We’d like more detailed reports."
"Zscaler Private Access could improve by improving external access. If external parties want to access locally to my company's services, we need to onboard them into our domain, otherwise, it doesn't work. Additionally, if their company also has Zscaler Private Access, then it doesn't work. They need to log in with our domain ID, not their company ID."
"We would like to extend the SASE applications for Zscaler."
"I can't speak to any missing features."
"What could be improved in Zscaler Private Access is its notification. For example, if there's a speed issue, there should be a pop-up that alerts the user about it. If there is a network quality issue, for example, it isn't good enough to connect to, or the network quality is bad, there should be a notification from the solution. Zscaler Private Access also needs improvement in terms of its interface and security."
SecureLink is ranked 20th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Zscaler Private Access is ranked 5th in ZTNA as a Service with 5 reviews. SecureLink is rated 7.0, while Zscaler Private Access is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Private Access writes "User-friendly, easy to customize, and simple to implement". SecureLink is most compared with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Citrix Gateway and OpenVPN Access Server, whereas Zscaler Private Access is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Netskope Private Access, Perimeter 81 and Duo Security.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
