SecureLink vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

The compared Imprivata and Zscaler solutions aren't in the same category. Imprivata is ranked #32 in EIV , and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Zscaler is ranked #1 in ZaaS , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 17.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imprivata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

SecureLink

Read 1 SecureLink review

587 Views
78 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 63 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

7,111 Views
941 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

SecureLink

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, OpenVPN, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SecureLink

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (32nd)

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (2nd), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (5th), Application Control (4th), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (12th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. SecureLink is designed for Enterprise Infrastructure VPN and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, on the other hand, focuses on ZTNA as a Service, holds 17.2% mindshare, down 22.6% since last year.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

ZTNA as a Service

Featured Reviews

Frederic Soulier

Deputy Head of IT at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees

Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security

We would like to be to secure access to all of the servers for all of the internal workers and engineers. We would like to have tools that provide us with security for our servers. I would like to see an improved repository to better see the users. We have a new project that requires a lot of security we will not continue with SecureLink. The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough.

Read full review

Sumit Bhanwala

architect at Tata Consultancy

Cloud-based platform simplifies device and data center management

I find it to be good. The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing. We are less dependent on data centers and device management, which reduces our efforts significantly. It improves our device management, data center management, and updating devices. We need fewer engineers for this management, and it reduces time and efforts for data center management, device upgrades, and IT support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."

"Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet."

"The Live Logs are a cool feature. We can directly identify issues and divert user traffic."

"SASE's most valuable features are proxy and content filtering."

"The agent's versatility is notable, used for digital experience monitoring to collect valuable endpoint metrics for troubleshooting."

"The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."

"The tool's scalability is good."

"The customer service and support are very good."

"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."

"There is improvement in enhancing proper manageability, policies, and logs. So, log management could be improved."

"The granularity in blocking is not sufficient, as new domains are automatically blocked for 30 days without further information."

"We often face performance and latency issues with Zscaler SASE."

"Users report application access or latency issues with Zscaler Private Access."

"The menu for the ZIA portal could be organized a little bit differently. The most-used modules should be at the top of the menus, not somewhere near the bottom, some of them are not organized well in my opinion."

"User management can be improved."

"Occasionally, issues arise in the LogStack by a third party, particularly for government websites accessed by numerous users."

"There aren't really any missing features that I have witnessed."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are not happy with the recent increase in the price."

"In the long run, cloud services are not inherently costly."

"Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."

"The price is competitive."

"Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"As per industry leads, Zscaler CASB is an expensive solution."

"There is definitely an ROI."

"Zscaler Private Access can be an expensive solution, depending on the license type you will purchase."

"It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific n...

See all answers

Comparisons

Citrix Gateway vs SecureLink

Compared 60% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs SecureLink

Compared 40% of the time

More SecureLink Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 7% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

June 2025

Download SecureLink product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

June 2025

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

SecureLink is the leader in managing secure third-party remote access and remote support for enterprise organizations and technology vendors. More than 30,000 world-class companies across multiple highly regulated industries, including healthcare, retail, government, financial, legal and gaming, rely on SecureLink’s purpose-built platform to securely control network access, ensure industry compliance, manage audit trails, decrease time to resolution, and reduce liability.

The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Austin, Texas with a second office in Costa Rica.

Imprivata

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

NISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, OpenVPN, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.