SecureLink vs Zscaler Private Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Private Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."

More SecureLink Pros →

"What I find most valuable in Zscaler Private Access is that it's a VPN. Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature.""It is straightforward to set up.""The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get.""I like the web filtering capabilities.""The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is we do not have to connect to a VPN, it is seamless. It is more convenient for us because we use one agent to cover the internet and VPN access."

More Zscaler Private Access Pros →

Cons
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."

More SecureLink Cons →

"Sometimes applications crash on some machines, and we’d like Zscaler to give us some information as to why that may have happened. We’d like more detailed reports.""Zscaler Private Access could improve by improving external access. If external parties want to access locally to my company's services, we need to onboard them into our domain, otherwise, it doesn't work. Additionally, if their company also has Zscaler Private Access, then it doesn't work. They need to log in with our domain ID, not their company ID.""We would like to extend the SASE applications for Zscaler.""I can't speak to any missing features.""What could be improved in Zscaler Private Access is its notification. For example, if there's a speed issue, there should be a pop-up that alerts the user about it. If there is a network quality issue, for example, it isn't good enough to connect to, or the network quality is bad, there should be a notification from the solution. Zscaler Private Access also needs improvement in terms of its interface and security."

More Zscaler Private Access Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are not happy with the recent increase in the price."
  • More SecureLink Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • More Zscaler Private Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    655,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors.
    Top Answer:The price needs to be lower. We are not happy with the recent increase in the price.
    Top Answer:We would like to be to secure access to all of the servers for all of the internal workers and engineers. We would like to have tools that provide us with security for our servers. I would like to see… more »
    Top Answer: We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is we do not have to connect to a VPN, it is seamless. It is more convenient for us because we use one agent to cover the internet and VPN access.
    Top Answer:Zscaler Private Access could improve by improving external access. If external parties want to access locally to my company's services, we need to onboard them into our domain, otherwise, it doesn't… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    511
    Comparisons
    348
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    7.0
    5th
    out of 29 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    14,656
    Comparisons
    11,638
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    SecureLink is the leader in managing secure third-party remote access and remote support for enterprise organizations and technology vendors. More than 30,000 world-class companies across multiple highly regulated industries, including healthcare, retail, government, financial, legal and gaming, rely on SecureLink’s purpose-built platform to securely control network access, ensure industry compliance, manage audit trails, decrease time to resolution, and reduce liability.

    The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Austin, Texas with a second office in Costa Rica.

    Zscaler Private Access delivers policy-based, secure access to private applications and assets without the cost, hassle, or security risks of a VPN. Using the Zscaler App, users can now get all of the benefits of Zscaler’s Cloud Security Platform for Internet traffic, as well as granular, policy-based access to internal resources from a single point.

    More Information: https://www.zscaler.com/produc...

    Offer
    Learn more about SecureLink
    Learn more about Zscaler Private Access
    Sample Customers
    NISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts
    NOV, Growmark, Paychex, MAN Energy Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company23%
    Government11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2022.
    655,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SecureLink is ranked 20th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Zscaler Private Access is ranked 5th in ZTNA as a Service with 5 reviews. SecureLink is rated 7.0, while Zscaler Private Access is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Private Access writes "User-friendly, easy to customize, and simple to implement". SecureLink is most compared with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Citrix Gateway and OpenVPN Access Server, whereas Zscaler Private Access is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Netskope Private Access, Perimeter 81 and Duo Security.

    We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.