SecureLink vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Netgate Logo
63 views|25 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Imprivata Logo
489 views|380 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Zscaler Logo
10,795 views|8,553 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.""The solution has good performance."

More Netgate TNSR Pros →

"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."

More SecureLink Pros →

"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once.""The scalability of the solution is great.""The Live Logs are a cool feature. We can directly identify issues and divert user traffic.""The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are its ability to integrate with multiple IDPs and application segmentation.""Zscaler Private Access is a platform that eliminates the complexity of VPN configuration.""The most valuable features are the File Type Control and SSL bypass policies. We""We don't need to connect anymore. It is automatically connected when you log on in Windows.""The ZPA is a unique feature which offers VPN along with all the additional security needed."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pros →

Cons
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."

More Netgate TNSR Cons →

"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."

More SecureLink Cons →

"We'd like to have two-factor authentication that is quite simple.""We would like to extend the SASE applications for Zscaler.""There could be more DLP-related features. Additionally, there needs to be flexibility for integrating ISP features.""Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security.""What could be improved in Zscaler Private Access is its notification. For example, if there's a speed issue, there should be a pop-up that alerts the user about it. If there is a network quality issue, for example, it isn't good enough to connect to, or the network quality is bad, there should be a notification from the solution. Zscaler Private Access also needs improvement in terms of its interface and security.""There is some issue while accessing the portal. It takes too long.""The pricing for Private Access seems to be on the expensive side, and I believe they should consider making it more competitive with other solutions.""It has massive room for improvement. The Zscaler product itself is okay, but it doesn't give enough granularity for us as an organization to stipulate rules or processes, especially for data-driven services. For instance, we can stick on SSL inspection, but it's just a click box. It doesn't allow us to go any further into the detail of the SSL inspection. We also can't pull it out without having an additional logging server. It just doesn't give us enough granularity. They should give us more control over the interfaces because it is all backend. They weren't very open to discussing their backend architecture with us in terms of their own data centers. They can maybe a little bit more open about what components are there and how the backend infrastructure works alongside Zscaler. Its licensing can be better. Some of the additional licensing costs are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Their support should also be improved. I initially had a consultant from Zscaler for its deployment, but the support that I had throughout the deployment of the project wasn't the best."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is not a license required for this solution but the price should be less expensive."
  • More Netgate TNSR Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We are not happy with the recent increase in the price."
  • More SecureLink Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."
  • "The cost is expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."
  • "The price is competitive."
  • "In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."
  • "Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."
  • More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.
    Top Answer:The product is very cost-effective and has no requirement for additional licenses. The setup is not easy. Users need… more »
    Top Answer:THe solution is used as a primary gateway with two lease lines of 450 Mbps total. Around 200 users are under it. There… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.
    Top Answer:Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TNSR
    Zscaler SASE
    Learn More
    Overview

    TNSR is an advanced open source-based secure networking software platform with highly-scalable packet processing, manageability, and service expansion capabilities. This video provides a high-level introduction. that address a number of commonly asked new product questions - in just a couple of minutes.

    SecureLink is the leader in managing secure third-party remote access and remote support for enterprise organizations and technology vendors. More than 30,000 world-class companies across multiple highly regulated industries, including healthcare, retail, government, financial, legal and gaming, rely on SecureLink’s purpose-built platform to securely control network access, ensure industry compliance, manage audit trails, decrease time to resolution, and reduce liability.

    The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Austin, Texas with a second office in Costa Rica.

    The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enables fast, secure connections and allows your employees to work from anywhere using the internet as the corporate network. Based on the zero trust principle of least-privileged access, it provides comprehensive security using context-based identity and policy enforcement.

    The Zero Trust Exchange operates across 150 data centers worldwide, ensuring that the service is close to your users, co-located with the cloud providers and applications they are accessing, such as Microsoft 365 and AWS. It guarantees the shortest path between your users and their destinations, providing comprehensive security and an amazing user experience.

    Sample Customers
    UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
    NISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts
    Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company31%
    Government9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Pharma/Biotech Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. SecureLink is rated 7.0, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Cloudflare Access.

    We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.