No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Screen vs Unified Vulnerability Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Screen
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (151st)
Unified Vulnerability Manag...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Screen and Unified Vulnerability Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Screen is designed for AWS Marketplace and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, down 0.3% compared to last year.
Unified Vulnerability Management, on the other hand, focuses on Risk-Based Vulnerability Management, holds 2.3% mindshare, down 3.0% since last year.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Screen0.2%
SettleMint DALP0.4%
Arcus Cloud with single node0.3%
Other99.1%
AWS Marketplace
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Unified Vulnerability Management2.3%
Qualys Exposure Management9.7%
Tenable Security Center6.9%
Other81.1%
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Screen?
Leave a review
SA
Director, Technology at AmericaTech, Inc.
Unified vulnerability management has strengthened credential defenses and improves risk-based decisions
I believe Unified Vulnerability Management can improve by emphasizing continuous monitoring, which necessitates a dashboard for users. Creating more mobility, especially since many incidents occur outside regular hours, would be beneficial. If anything goes wrong, a mobile version or mobile dashboard could be extremely helpful. Mobility is now a mandatory capability, allowing users to manage vulnerabilities through mobile applications. Beyond mobility for Unified Vulnerability Management, more flexibility is also required. For example, vulnerability scanners routinely scan and create reports. It would be beneficial if I could create a runbook so that if any unwanted events occur, it generates alerts and stops operations. This would create a complete package for secure posture and management, allowing me to protect not just through scans but also through prevention.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
912,788 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
45%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Construction Company
21%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Unified Vulnerability Management?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is not directly managed by me; however, I strongly recommend Tenable as I view it as a prime vulnerability management application worldwide. Ev...
What needs improvement with Unified Vulnerability Management?
In Unified Vulnerability Management, the area that needs improvement is DNS-level security, which has been lacking for the last ten years. Other vendors, such as Cloudflare and Netskope, excel in D...
What is your primary use case for Unified Vulnerability Management?
Unified Vulnerability Management is used for vulnerability management, involving finding vulnerabilities on devices and providing recommendations. Based on these recommendations, we manually check ...
 

Also Known As

Assessment
Avalor
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, HailBytes, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: August 2026.
912,788 professionals have used our research since 2012.