We performed a comparison between Sciforma and Zoho Projects based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"The product is very easy to understand."
"It integrates so well with other Zoho applications, and that really helps to extend the features of Zoho Projects."
"The timeline features are excellent."
"The product can be seamlessly integrated into our CRM."
"Timesheets and the ability to add attachments are very valuable features to us."
"We were able to track each department's work and what they were doing inside the actual department. Gantt charts are useful to track departmental progress and operation, or we are that item stuff."
"While integrating a voice solution with Zoho Projects, the focus was on creating a unified interface for voice and customer engagement across various platforms like Facebook, social media, and emails. The primary goal was to seamlessly merge the two platforms into a single interface. To achieve this, we engaged in API integrations and worked on aspects such as initializing, authentication, and access control."
"It is a scalable solution."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"It is not easy to drag and drop a task from one person to the other. I think the resolution for the issue is work in progress. The product's stability can be improved."
"Sometimes the solution does not work."
"The UI and UX must be improved."
"The tool should add live chat, live call, and live meeting features where clients can communicate."
"If given the opportunity, I would focus on improving automation within Zoho Projects. While attempting to integrate with other platforms, users often encounter errors. The integration capabilities of Zoho Projects could be enhanced. Currently, the integration options are categorized as either easy or customized, with the latter requiring deluge code, which might pose challenges due to its lesser-known usage."
"Its template management feature could be easier to use."
"The telephone support provided by the support team should become better."
"The only room for improvement over here is a feature related to the trend, like AI-related things that we can expect need to be introduced."
Sciforma is ranked 19th in Project Management Software with 3 reviews while Zoho Projects is ranked 14th in Project Management Software with 14 reviews. Sciforma is rated 9.6, while Zoho Projects is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho Projects writes "A scalable solution with great features that enable efficient collaboration". Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Zoho Projects is most compared with Trello and monday.com. See our Sciforma vs. Zoho Projects report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
