We performed a comparison between SAP S4HANA on AWS and VMware Cloud Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"There are two main features that we find very valuable. One is the interface and the new user experience. That's really, really helpful for the end-user. The second is the HANA database itself because it speeds up the process. In other solutions, like Oracle, there is a lot of redundancy that slows things down."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"SAP has an auto-scaling feature, but Azure doesn't."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"The Fiori interface is the most valuable feature. It's one of the highlights that they offer. The in-memory of S4 is very fast."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The DSR feature is valuable because we have internal clustering, and these features are good for us."
"VMware Cloud Foundation's most valuable features are password and certificate management. The SDDC manager tool is the front tool we are using to manage the entire VCF stack. In the SDDC manager, we can able to rotate, and update the passwords of all users. Anything in the VMware portfolio, we can manage from a single dashboard and we have various data centers. We have connected everything into one Federation. From one single place, we are managing our entire virtual interactions."
"It is a scalable platform."
"The stability is good."
"The solution is very stable."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy."
"I like that VMware Cloud Foundation reduces both the installation and setup time from a matter of weeks to hours."
"The product's implementation phase can be very complex for customers."
"The documentation isn't clear enough."
"We had some storage and legacy migrations problems with SAP S4HANA on AWS."
"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."
"The pricing is a little bit high."
"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."
"If you go to AWS's site they offer training programs that are very good. SAP does not do the same, if SAP could provide some training that would be great."
"The solution could improve by being more secure."
"The price could be better. VMware Cloud Foundation is overpriced, but I think we get what we pay for. It would be better if it were cheaper because it would be easier to go to customers and get them to buy it. We'd get more projects, and that would be great."
"Cost is a challenge when convincing clients, especially for large deals."
"The customization has room for improvement."
"From a stability perspective, there may be some issues."
"Working on features that could include the capability to migrate workflows from non-VMware environments would be highly beneficial."
"VMware Cloud Foundation could be more flexible in terms of supporting other integration and components."
"They need to offer more support for Mac."
SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews while VMware Cloud Foundation is ranked 10th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 23 reviews. SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2, while VMware Cloud Foundation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Cloud Foundation writes "Offers automated deployment features that enhances operational efficiency and simplifying complex tasks ". SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS, whereas VMware Cloud Foundation is most compared with Azure Stack, Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), AWS Outposts, Google Anthos and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). See our SAP S4HANA on AWS vs. VMware Cloud Foundation report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
