Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs Springpath [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Sangfor and Cisco are both solutions in the HCI category. Additionally, 88% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution.

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converg...

Read 31 Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure reviews

6,920 Views
4,636 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Springpath [EOL]

Read 1 Springpath [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converg...

Springpath [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure and Springpath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in HCI.

To learn more, read our detailed HCI Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HCI

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converg...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (30th), HCI (10th)

Springpath [EOL]

Average Rating

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Zaid Farooqui

CIO at Indus Motor Company

Enhanced private cloud flexibility with superior native backup capabilities

Sangfor HCI provides the flexibility of building our own private cloud. It has also enhanced our infrastructure management by enabling single-window operations for managing all the HCI clusters, including applications, and offers excellent reporting and visualization capabilities. Furthermore, it supports our AI-driven projects, which involve machine learning and computer vision analytics.

Read full review

it_user693828

Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

This product has a lot of room to improve: Competitors have a much larger feature-set, stability during installations/upgrades is a big issue.

During my first installation (Version 1.7) I ran into problems, took about 3 weeks for me to fix. During the upgrade to version 1.8 I ran into another problem: I had to escape all VM’s to another storage solution and had to restart the complete installation, which also failed miserably. The upgrade from 1.8 to 2.0 was going OK, but then I received a message from Cisco that they ran into problems with this upgrade (and so they didn’t recommend this upgrade). In short, upgrades and installations cause a stability issue. If Cisco Hyperflex/Springpath is running, it is stable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We find the topology feature of Sangfor HCI particularly valuable."

"It is a smart solution for virtualization"

"I would rate the user-friendliness an eight out of ten."

"Scalability is very good."

"Sangfor HCI was attractive to us because of the simplicity of its licensing and lack of hidden costs compared to its competitors."

"The Continuous Data Protection (CDP) feature is one of the good features."

"Sangfor technical support is great."

"The product is very easy to manage, the cost is a lot cheaper than VMware, the solution is stable, and it's scalable."

More Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure pros

"Integration with vCenter WebClient services and Cisco UCS Ecosystem, as it gives a Single Pane Of Management which lowers administration-cost (improving TCO)."

Cons

"It can have more compatibility and new features. I would also like to see better performance. Some of the other HCI solutions already provide the SSD and flash storage and much higher Intel processors. Sangfor HCI can improve on that."

"Sangfor HCI has room for improvement in terms of integration. So, the integration with Sangfor HCI is not as extensive as in Nutanix."

"One question that has come up frequently in the last week is whether or not the renewal cost for Sangfor's HCI solution is too high."

"I would like Sangfor to have a presence on some public cloud offerings, such as Azure or AWS, to build disaster recovery sites."

"Currently, when we need to do capacity planning, we have to rely on Sangfor's support team for assistance. However, if there were dedicated tools available, we could handle it ourselves and increase efficiency."

"Stability is also an area for improvement here as well."

"Its virtual machine tools can be improved. These tools should be enhanced for use in other applications and operating systems, such as Linux."

"The documentation and support from the community are not as good or as mature as VMware or Hyper-V."

More Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure cons

"With version 1.7 and 1.8 the installation was a nightmare, there were many manual steps to take and if there was something wrong with the installation you had to restart by re-entering all settings (if you didn’t use a .XML file)."

"Stability during installations/upgrades is a big issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."

"Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure is a reasonably priced product."

"The tool’s pricing is better when compared to VMware or Nutanix. The product’s licensing is on a yearly basis."

"I would say its pricing is between cheap and reasonable and would rate it as three out of five."

"The solution is very cheap."

"The pricing of Sangfor is very competitive."

"The solution is on-premise which does not have a subscription. However, there is a need to purchase support. The solution is on a perpetual license model. There is not any extra cost other than the standard licensing fees."

"The price of Sangfor is cheaper than other competing products."

More Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sangfor HCI?

I rate the pricing of Sangfor HCI at a five, as it is thirty to thirty-five percent more efficient than other solutions in terms of total cost of ownership.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor HCI?

I would like Sangfor to have a presence on some public cloud offerings, such as Azure or AWS, to build disaster recovery sites. This functionality is currently missing in the Pakistani market.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor HCI?

The primary use case for Sangfor HCI involves running all workloads that were not for SAP on conventional servers using Hyper-V. We migrated all of these instances from Hyper-V to Sangfor HCI. We a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

Compared 8% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

Compared 7% of the time

Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure vs Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

Compared 5% of the time

HPE SimpliVity vs Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

Compared 4% of the time

VxRail vs Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

Compared 3% of the time

More Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure Competitors

Red Hat Gluster Storage vs Springpath [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Springpath [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs Springpath [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Springpath [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

HPE StoreVirtual vs Springpath [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Springpath [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

August 2026

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure report

Download Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure product report

Buyer's Guide

HCI

August 2026

Download Springpath [EOL] product report

Overview

Sangfor HCI offers an efficient, user-friendly hyper-converged infrastructure solution with strong integration capabilities. It provides robust scalability, data recovery, and easy cloud support with competitive pricing.

Sangfor HCI delivers a hyper-converged infrastructure that integrates computing, storage, and networking into a single system. It features a user-friendly interface and seamless integration. The solution offers robust scalability, data recovery capabilities, and built-in backup. Organizations appreciate its single management console and high security through native firewalls. Migration from other platforms is simplified, and native cloud support broadens its appeal. Sangfor HCI allows infrastructure design with topology and comprehensive technical support. However, improvements are needed in command line availability, documentation, security features, performance, and cloud integration.

What are the most important features of Sangfor HCI?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing structure.
Seamless integration: Integrates easily with existing systems.
User-friendly interface: Simplifies operations and increases efficiency.
Data recovery: Provides strong data recovery and built-in backup.
Scalability: Easily scales infrastructure as needed.

What are the potential benefits when evaluating Sangfor HCI?

Cost savings: Provides a cost-effective alternative to traditional systems.
Resource utilization: Maximizes existing resources effectively.
Management efficiency: Simplifies management with a single console.
Security enhancement: Native firewalls ensure high security.
Cloud readiness: Supports migration to cloud services smoothly.

Sangfor HCI is implemented across industries such as financial and manufacturing for virtualization, storage, and network management. It helps manage virtual machines and private cloud capabilities, supporting business applications like MES, ERP, SAP, and healthcare services. Organizations value its competitive pricing and cost-effective approach compared to other solutions, allowing workload shifts from conventional servers while maximizing resource utilization.

Sangfor

Springpath is the pioneer in hyperconvergence software, turning standard servers of choice into a single pool of compute and storage resources. The Springpath Data Platform eliminates the need for network storage and intuitively integrates into existing management tools to maximize operational efficiency. Using adaptive scaling capabilities, customers can grow compute, caching or capacity resources independently, depending on their changing business needs. Springpath proactively monitors your infrastructure to ensure resilient, always-on availability. Using data management and optimization capabilities, Springpath customers experience transformative levels of resource utilization, accelerating the adoption of DevOps in their organization with truly agile IT infrastructure.

Cisco

Sample Customers

TOSHIBA TEC Singapore, J&T Express Indonesia, Crowne Plaza Vietnam, Hermina Hospital Indonesia

Sigma Designs, Superior Document Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in HCI. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best HCI vendors.

We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.