Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
  • Home
  • RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs. WS_FTP Server

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs WS_FTP Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo

Control-M

Read 53 Control-M reviews
33,681 views|13,420 comparisons
RepliWeb Logo

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]

views| comparisons
Progress Software Logo

WS_FTP Server

252 views|215 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
September 2022
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] and WS_FTP Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs. WS_FTP Server report (Updated: September 2022).
Download the complete report
636,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Karim
Enabled us to consolidate and streamline our development process, while building on existing skills
It gave us the ability to consolidate a diverse set of solutions into one comprehensive solution that streamlined our development processes. It was... Read more →
Use RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]?
Use WS_FTP Server?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    636,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    What is the biggest difference between Oracle DAC Scheduler and Control-M?
    Top Answer:Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:We have a better picture of our auditability. When someone comes to us, and asks for sources, "How did the deltas… more »
    Read all 48 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Learn More
    BMC
    RepliWeb
    Video Not Available
    Progress Software
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility
    Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.

    WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.

    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn More
    Learn more about RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]
    Learn More
    Learn more about WS_FTP Server
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
    BraunAbility, H&M Software, Killeen School, Positive Images UK, Scientific American, Sciforma, The Denver Broncos
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Insurance Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Insurance Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government14%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    September 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: September 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    636,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is ranked unranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while WS_FTP Server is ranked 27th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 0.0, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. On the other hand, RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with , whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway and CompleteFTP.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.