• Home
  • RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs. WS_FTP Server

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs WS_FTP Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] and WS_FTP Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We use it for on-premises hosting of web applications.
The deployment speed has been increased. We get accurate results when copying data.
Use WS_FTP Server?
Ranking
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
22nd
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
426
Comparisons
390
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
RepliWeb
Video Not Available
Progress Software
Overview
Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.

WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.

Sample Customers
Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
BraunAbility, H&M Software, Killeen School, Positive Images UK, Scientific American, Sciforma, The Denver Broncos
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government11%
Computer Software Company10%
Healthcare Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while WS_FTP Server is ranked 22nd in Managed File Transfer (MFT). RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 8.2, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] writes "Website code can be done by application owners". On the other hand, RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with , whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway, CompleteFTP, Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.