IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Quintype vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quintype Logo
94 views|75 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
20,857 views|17,911 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Liferay and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2022.
599,220 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."
  • "Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    599,220 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    Hi. I would suggest Ezofis which has a lot of customization and ease of use features compared to Alfresco. Even the pricing is better compared to ECM products in the market.
    Top Answer: 
    No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution.
    Top Answer: 
    It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month. There are no additional costs.
    Ranking
    29th
    Views
    94
    Comparisons
    75
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    Views
    20,857
    Comparisons
    17,911
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    749
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    Bold is the CMS that understands your content. Unlike a traditional CMS, Bold separates the presentation of the content from the content itself. This makes it effortless to create, curate and distribute content for modern consumption across different screens and screen-less voice devices. With a content workflow that is modeled after an effective newsroom, Bold makes it easy for authors to tell stories better with built-in support for reusable content cards, story elements, and story types.

    All content added on Bold is optimized for distribution across channels such as SEO, Social and Mobile. Third-party integrations include Apple News, Google News, Facebook Instant Articles, AMP, PWA, Push notifications, email marketing, RSS feeds and others.

    As a hosted SaaS CMS, Bold manages server management, performance, security and upgrades for its clients so that digital publishers can focus on creating great content for their audience.

    Bold offers developers well-documented APIs, starter kits and design consulting services to jumpstart their own front-end development.

    Bold offers free onboarding, migration services, 24/7 chat/email support, auto-scaling infrastructure, 95.95% uptime guarantee and regular backups.

    Pricing for bold begins at $99/mo.

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Offer
    Learn more about Quintype
    Learn more about SharePoint
    Sample Customers
    BloombergQuint, The Quint, National Herald, Samachara
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    University9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Management
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Liferay and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2022.
    599,220 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Quintype is ranked 29th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 8 reviews. Quintype is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Offers great OCR capabilities, metadata storage and proficient archiving ". Quintype is most compared with Wordpress.com VIP, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Box, WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, OpenText Documentum and IBM FileNet.

    See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.