We performed a comparison between Quantum ActiveScale and VAST Data based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two File and Object Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technology is stable which is good."
"Workflow is easy to manage and maintain."
"The solution is useful for machine learning and scientific applications, including computer simulations."
"This has been one of the most reliable storage systems that I have ever used."
"Lacks some ability to integrate with different systems."
"We would like to see a self-sufficient installation."
"The read/write ratio is an area in the solution with some flaws and needs improvement."
"The write performance could be improved because it is less than half of the read performance."
Earn 20 points
Quantum ActiveScale is ranked 20th in File and Object Storage while VAST Data is ranked 12th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. Quantum ActiveScale is rated 7.6, while VAST Data is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Quantum ActiveScale writes "Good performance and reliable but the setup is complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VAST Data writes "Stability-wise, a device that has been up and running for years". Quantum ActiveScale is most compared with Dell ECS, Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Qumulo and MinIO, whereas VAST Data is most compared with Pure Storage FlashBlade, NetApp AFF, Pure Storage FlashArray, Qumulo and Dell PowerScale (Isilon). See our Quantum ActiveScale vs. VAST Data report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
