Pure Storage Evergreen One vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

The compared Pure Storage and Amazon Web Services (AWS) solutions aren't in the same category. Pure Storage is ranked #15 in CS , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 1.5% mindshare in the category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 in ISI , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pure Storage users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Read 4 Pure Storage Evergreen One reviews

123 Views
56 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 41 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,208 Views
1,821 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Pure Storage Evergreen One

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Pure Storage Evergreen One and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, NetApp, Dropbox and others in Cloud Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (15th), File and Object Storage (14th), Managed Cloud Services (4th)

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Pure Storage Evergreen One is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 1.5%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
SAP S4HANA on AWS, on the other hand, focuses on Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS), holds 3.7% mindshare, up 3.1% since last year.

Cloud Storage

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Michael-Daniel

Virtual Storage Administrator at Coast

Exceptional speed improves performance with short and long-term storage

We are using it in-house for our data center to run all of our VMware environment and our VDI environment on. Infrastructure consumption, as well as short-term and long-term storage, is included The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous environment we were…

Read full review

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

Strong integration in manufacturing and enhances flexibility with useful workflow management

Installation is very straightforward, however, implementation takes years or months based on the project's size. In manufacturing, the requirement might go from ten to 12 people. If I'm a sales-oriented company, such as an FMCG or something else, then I might need around seven or eight people at the very minimum. It is not an easy task to migrate. If I'm moving from a different ERP to S/4HANA, I need a proper project that probably spans several months, with significant engagement from both the business side and the technical side. I need an opportunity partner on it. Processing to SCE S/4HANA takes a bit of effort.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Evergreen program is excellent, and the pricing is quite reasonable. My friends who work there are doing very well and consistently achieving strong results. Like any company, they experience occasional downturns but perform impressively overall."

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

"We have snapshots. We put snapshots on disks, and we can save information. In the case of ransomware, everything is in the snapshot. We have a snapshot lock on it, so it's safe."

"Pure Storage has the highest Net Promoter Score in the market."

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous peer environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

"We have found the retail business features to be the most valuable."

"Especially for manufacturing, it offers great integration with my costing."

"Overall, I am very satisfied with the solution, and it has proven to be highly beneficial to our organization."

"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."

"They have their own instances where you can host your database."

"The reporting capability is good, providing very in-depth information."

"After the implementation phase of the product, it becomes a very stable tool."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"Many customers report that the starting price is quite high. However, the overall total cost of ownership can be reduced over time due to features like the Evergreen architecture, which allows savings through less management and environmental benefits."

"The only potential drawback is that Pure Storage might be overkill if you don't need microsecond response times."

"I'm not sure if any improvements are needed."

"It would be nice to have support in Swedish."

"To me, I think it's a little expensive. Then again, you get what you pay for."

"The solution is costlier than other products."

"The drawback of this tool versus an on-site tool is that you've got to upgrade the tool. The software is upgraded as it gets upgraded and you've got to be ready to change whatever processes and do whatever training you need to do."

"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."

"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."

"More availability zones will help customers choose AWS. I would like to see features that provide easier onboarding for ERP solutions like SAP. SAP has already partnered with S/4HANA on AWS for hosting its public cloud as well. More educational videos for customers to choose this cloud path would be great to have. That is, providing more documentation and marketing material would be better."

"SAP S4HANA could be improved by adding a click-to-deploy model."

"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."

"We had some storage and legacy migrations problems with SAP S4HANA on AWS."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very good."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"I would rate the pricing as a two and a half out of five."

"SAP S4HANA's pricing model should be more flexible and transparent - there's a lot of negotiation and internal factors, and some customers get better value and services for the same product."

"The licensing of the product is reasonable but the cost of the hardware is exorbitant."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS has reasonable pricing."

"It is a significant investment, around six hundred thousand dollars, and it involves both a one-time on-premises installation on servers and a cloud subscription with different flavors for SAP S4HANA."

"The price of SAP S4HANA on AWS is reasonable, given how much it costs to maintain a scratch-built system. To upgrade the support there is a fee."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

Initially, the starting price is high, but over time, due to reduced management needs and environmental savings, the total cost of ownership decreases.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage Evergreen One?

Many customers report that the starting price is quite high. However, the overall total cost of ownership can be reduced over time due to features like the Evergreen ( /products/evergreen-reviews )...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

I am not a user of Pure Storage Evergreen One ( /products/pure-storage-evergreen-one-reviews ). I manage this brand in a technology company to distribute the product. I am working in a reseller bus...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE GreenLake vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 42% of the time

Dell APEX vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 33% of the time

NetApp Keystone vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 12% of the time

More Pure Storage Evergreen One Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 69% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

June 2025

Download Pure Storage Evergreen One product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

June 2025

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Overview

The Pure Storage Evergreen Portfolio offers a range of subscription-based storage solutions tailored to diverse data storage, management, and cost needs. Providing unmatched choice and flexibility, it offers multiple subscription models to align with varying requirements and budgets while leveraging Pure Storage's proven Evergreen Architecture for non-disruptive upgrades and futureproofing. The portfolio includes three specific programs: Evergreen//One, a hybrid cloud storage solution with guaranteed SLA; Evergreen//Flex, offering subscription-based ownership with flexible payment structures; and Evergreen//Forever, providing ongoing hardware and software upgrades for traditional storage purchases, simplifying ownership and eliminating the need for frequent hardware replacements.

Pure Storage

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Aflac 5. Allstate 6. Amazon 7. American Express 8. American Greetings 9. Ameriprise Financial 10. ATT 11. Autodesk 12. Bank of America 13. Barclay's 14. Baxter International 15. Berkshire Hathaway 16. BlackRock 17. Boeing 18. Bristol-Myers Squibb 19. Capital One 20. Caterpillar 21. Citigroup 22. Coca-Cola 23. Comcast2 4. ConocoPhillips 25. Constellation Brands 26. CVS Health 27. Dell 28. Disney 29. Dominion Energy 30. Eli Lilly and Company 31. Equinix 32. ExxonMobil

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, NetApp, Dropbox and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.