Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Profisee vs SAP Master Data Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Profisee
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (7th)
SAP Master Data Governance
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. Profisee is designed for Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) and holds a mindshare of 6.8%, down 9.4% compared to last year.
SAP Master Data Governance, on the other hand, focuses on Master Data Management (MDM) Software, holds 11.1% mindshare, down 20.5% since last year.
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Profisee6.8%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)21.6%
Reltio Cloud13.3%
Other58.3%
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM)
Master Data Management (MDM) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Master Data Governance11.1%
TIBCO EBX9.1%
Semarchy xDM8.7%
Other71.1%
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2584719 - PeerSpot reviewer
MDM Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Unlocks efficient data mastering with custom interfaces and upcoming integrations
We use Profisee for mastering data between multiple systems like ERP and CRM within our company The product helps us by allowing us to bring data in from any system that we need, master it, and deliver clean records for data and analytics. Profisee's ability to master data using the Goldstein…
UdayReddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
Detailed technical support and data integration capabilities create seamless user experience
Regarding SAP Master Data Governance, there is significant room for improvement particularly concerning the replication types. For example, when a vendor master is created in Ariba and a request is submitted from the Ariba system, SAP Ariba directs it to MDG. MDG verifies the details entirely through PI/PO or CPI. Once MDG verifies the data, the request is submitted to the S/4HANA system, the target. After a final approval at all levels, the vendor number is generated, and the vendor code gets passed from source to target system. This number is available in both the Ariba integration in the systems and in SAP BPT code, as well as the S/4HANA system.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Profisee's customer service is very responsive, and they have a comprehensive training academy, Profisee Academy, that helps guide the implementation process."
"The product is able to utilize the SQL server toolkit and it has tight integration with the SQL server."
"The most valuable features for ensuring data accuracy and quality are mappings and creating business rules."
"The process of categorizing data, creating glossaries, and generating metadata is streamlined and less time-consuming."
"We really like the matching and merging features."
"SAP Master Data Governance integrates well."
"User-friendly and provides customized reports and personalized data."
"We've found the solution to be quite flexible."
"SAP is a closed tool. Integrating with it requires a lot of effort and money. It is also very expensive and not flexible."
"The main purpose of SAP Master Data Governance is maintaining a single source of truth for enterprise data, and it helps a lot and works quite well."
"Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions."
"The data capturing and data governance features are valuable."
"SAP MDG has extensive data models and good integration with upstream and downstream systems."
 

Cons

"When we updated to version 7.1, there were some workflow issues."
"Some security complexities might add time to the setup."
"Profisee could improve in providing clearer data lineage information."
"A more convenient approach would involve integrating all the pre-existing elements into Profisee itself."
"The way training is laid out in their Profisee University, makes it really, really hard to find what you need fast."
"The user interface is not user-friendly."
"The price can be improved."
"There were challenges with handling multiple values within a single input field at the screen level."
"Bill of materials (BOM) creation in manufacturing needs to be enhanced in SAP Master Data Governance."
"SAP could do better in attracting talent and simplifying technology adoption."
"There is no clarity and direction on how to manage bills of materials (BOMs) or routing in MDG."
"They should improve the solution's performance as sometimes the process consumes much time."
"The user experience can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is moderate, falling in the middle range—not excessively low nor overly expensive."
"We didn't come across any additional licensing fees."
"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."
"We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price."
"The licensing cost is reasonable."
"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"The solution is costly."
"The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."
"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Profisee?
The most valuable features for ensuring data accuracy and quality are mappings and creating business rules.
What needs improvement with Profisee?
Profisee is making improvements for the year 2024, including integrating directly with other solutions.
What do you like most about SAP Master Data Governance?
We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Master Data Governance?
The challenge with SAP MDG is not only the cost but the resources. The skills required are niche in the market, and while you can purchase the product either one time or on a subscription basis, th...
What needs improvement with SAP Master Data Governance?
I don't see any disadvantages or areas for improvement that I can think of, to be honest. It's sometimes challenging when you have to develop custom fields, but then usually it works, even when dep...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP MDG
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NASDAQ, Rockwell Automation, ITT Industries, EY (Ernst & Young), Domino's, L3 Communications, Anheuser Busch, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Ameriprise Financial, GSO Capital Partners
Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
Find out what your peers are saying about Profisee vs. SAP Master Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.