No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Presidio RightStart vs Sharepoint 2016 Standard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Presidio RightStart
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service (28th), Agile and DevOps Services (33rd)
Sharepoint 2016 Standard
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Presidio RightStart and Sharepoint 2016 Standard aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Presidio RightStart is designed for Disaster Recovery as a Service and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Content Management, holds 0.3% mindshare, up 0.0% since last year.
Disaster Recovery as a Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Presidio RightStart1.2%
Azure Site Recovery9.5%
VMware Live Recovery9.4%
Other79.9%
Disaster Recovery as a Service
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sharepoint 2016 Standard0.3%
SharePoint11.7%
Alfresco6.7%
Other81.3%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Presidio RightStart?
Leave a review
Nishant Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
Centralized document libraries have streamlined daily collaboration and improved team productivity
In terms of improvements for Sharepoint 2016, I see how it can be improved regarding performance tweaks. Limiting view columns plus items is important because each extra column adds approximately 0.5 seconds of render time for 1,000 items. I keep default views under five to six columns and fewer than 1,000 items, utilizing filters such as "today" and "me". The next point is to avoid Group By on large lists as it adds HTML and slows rendering. Collapsed groups can make it worse, but using datasheet view for bulk edits renders faster than the standard view. Implementing minimum roles plus zero downtime patching, which is built into the 2016 setup, means we should configure minimum roles correctly so web front end, application server, and search servers can do only their job and speed up farms. In terms of user experience with adoption, governance and naming can be improved. Outdated sites plus inconsistent navigation make people revert to email. Setting naming rules, archive policies, and owners helps governance protect ROI. Ensuring optimized search queries, avoiding wildcards, and limiting results will lead to three times faster answers. Pushing OneDrive for Business sync will enable people to work offline. 2016 added durable links so links do not break when files move. Cutting customizations will make non-customized pages load much faster, so removing heavy web parts and custom JavaScript on homepages is essential. Reducing IT tickets can still be enhanced within these improvements. In addition to the needed improvements regarding user training, integrations, and support, I would stress the importance of these areas. Achieving a perfect ten for Sharepoint 2016 Standard would involve addressing a few issues. The mobile user experience feels clunky versus modern, and the absence of Power Automate makes some workflows feel dated. While search is good, it is not comparable to Google for intranet use. Additionally, support ending in 2026 is a ticking clock that needs consideration.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
75%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Healthcare Company
1%
Construction Company
32%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2016 Standard has been that it offers very competitive price plans, which are good for business.
What needs improvement with Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
I do not think there is anything missing in Sharepoint 2016 Standard. It is a vast platform and whatever use I plan to have on Sharepoint, I can navigate through it or search things on Google or an...
What is your primary use case for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
I started using Sharepoint 2016 Standard when I joined my current role because all of the files that we work on in collaboration with my teammates are stored on Sharepoint. It is quite a useful pla...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: May 2026.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.