

PostgreSQL and SingleStore compete in the database management system category. SingleStore seems to have the upper hand due to its speed and scalability.
Features: PostgreSQL supports advanced capabilities like full-text search, JSON, and spatial data types such as PostGIS. Its open-source nature adds to its versatility. SingleStore offers fast query performance and real-time analytics, efficiently handling transactional and analytical workloads on one platform, providing comprehensive in-memory storage solutions.
Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL needs better user-friendly documentation and tools for distributed computing, along with enhanced query optimization and multi-master replication. SingleStore lacks advanced SQL capabilities and could benefit from improved documentation and error handling, as well as a more developed semantic layer and built-in monitoring tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL offers flexibility in deployment across on-premises and public cloud environments, supported by a strong community. SingleStore emphasizes rapid deployment through cloud services but requires improvements in customer service, particularly in documentation and training resources.
Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is free, making it cost-effective by reducing licensing expenses, ideal for startups, and maximizing ROI by investing in expertise. SingleStore requires significant initial investment, especially for cloud services, yet offers a competitive ROI because of its real-time analytics capabilities and faster data processing.
The efficiency has increased significantly, and our workflows are consolidated into a single platform, thus reducing the operational overhead we previously faced.
The objective was to scale as data loads with high-performing query model responses.
I have seen a return on investment in terms of time saved.
If PostgreSQL is hosted on cloud services such as Amazon RDS or Google Cloud SQL, the support is handled by the cloud provider, who provides automated backups, monitoring, infrastructure management, and technical support tickets.
Overall, we have a very small customer service team and a good engineering team with no overburden or bandwidth issues.
For customizations and extensions, the community is very active and useful.
The customer support is very proactive and responsive twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week.
Their team is capable of resolving issues efficiently, allowing users to create tickets and receive support.
We have our own account manager who keeps us informed of the latest solutions and improvements in the system.
Now, we are doing the same level of transactions in PostgreSQL, around 100,000 transactions, and we are getting good throughput with no latency.
As our data volumes grow, we can expand resources without significant performance degradation.
SingleStore's scalability is really nice, as the process model includes master aggregator and slave aggregators or child aggregators, making it very well scalable both vertically and horizontally.
I have added both storage and additional instances many times, and it worked perfectly.
I have never seen any performance issue in PostgreSQL.
It handles large workloads and maintains consistent performance very well overall.
The performance and usability of SingleStore as a main database engine are significantly superior to other both paid and open-source solutions.
I have not seen any downtime.
PostgreSQL remains a strong choice for enterprise applications due to its stability, extensibility, and SQL standards compliance.
Query optimization improves slow queries by using proper indexes, avoiding unnecessary joins, and using EXPLAIN ANALYZE to inspect query plans.
If I need to increase the dimension to 3,000 or 5,000, that option should be available.
Error handling needs attention. When it fails due to memory, it only indicates that but not exactly in which process it failed.
The data which is sent to DataDog sometimes does not match with the SingleStore dashboard.
Better documentation for advanced use cases, especially where data volumes are very high and queries are frequent, would help us manage the feature more efficiently.
Even with doing 100,000 transactions right now within PostgreSQL, we are happy with PostgreSQL and not seeing that it is expensive or going out of budget.
The managed PostgreSQL itself is open source with no license fees.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it can be a bit expensive for startups.
The setup cost was surprisingly good, and our transfer to Helios was almost seamless, as far as databases go, and it was not expensive.
PostgreSQL improves reliability, performance, and scalability in production. Since it is ACID compliant, it ensures that database transactions are safe and consistent, preventing partial data updates, maintaining data integrity, and allowing multiple users to read or write data simultaneously using MVCC.
The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL.
Its robustness and reliability are incredible and stable, which is crucial for critical data, especially with AI model outputs.
SingleStore has impacted my organization positively by enabling us to run low-latency analytics and model-driven use cases at scale, which is quite difficult for OLAP and OLTP databases alone.
A very nice and useful feature is its compatibility with MySQL API, letting any system that can connect to MySQL also connect to SingleStore, thus solving many interoperability issues with different systems.
SingleStore is a distributed database that has the advantage that at any moment when resources are insufficient, there is a possibility to add more nodes, and everything is added online.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| PostgreSQL | 9.2% |
| SingleStore | 3.4% |
| Other | 87.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 58 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 26 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.
It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.
Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.
SingleStore delivers the performance you need for enterprise AI, providing the most performant data platform for apps and analytics at scale. SingleStore enables organizations to scale from one to one million customers in one unified platform. SingleStore offers transparent pricing as shown here https://www.singlestore.com/pricing/
SingleStore caters to over 400 customers globally, including major banks and tech companies in 50+ countries and 40+ verticals. It offers seamless scaling for both transactional and analytical workloads, simplifying data management with its MySQL compatibility and real-time processing capabilities. SingleStore's distributed architecture ensures speed and reliability, efficiently handling large data volumes.
What are the key features of SingleStore?
What benefits can users find in SingleStore reviews?
Top banks and fintech companies leverage SingleStore for efficient management of financial data, while media and telecom industries use it for scalable metadata management and improved data processing. Retail and eCommerce sectors benefit from enhanced transactional capabilities, reducing the need for separate databases and optimizing reporting processes. SingleStore's capacity to unite diverse workloads makes it a strategic choice across many sectors.
We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.