Planview Daptiv vs Trello comparison

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"Projects do not take as long and meetings take less time, since you know the status of developments or tests."

"What I like the most about Trello is how engaging and efficient it is. I like that it allows me to monitor which tasks have been completed and which ones haven't by removing a particular card away from the board, stating that the task has been done."

"I like the user interface's graphics and the general features and functionalities."

"The best feature Trello offers is that it keeps things better organized, so it makes things easier to collaborate with people."

"It has a very modern-looking interface."

"Trello simplifies collaboration, reducing long email chains that are hard to follow."

"The usability of this solution is its most valuable feature. It offers a great flow of creating a business rule that allows you to just add identifiers and qualifiers."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that I can see everything on one page, like sticky notes, and everything is set up, and it's pretty easy to use."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"I would like to see improvement in onboarding back-office team members."

"There can be bugs sometimes. When more than one person tries to edit the description at the same time, it can do some unexpected things."

"Pricing can be improved. You have to pay more to unlock certain features."

"We cannot link tasks that are dependent on each other."

"Sometimes, I find it challenging to manage the checklists."

"Users should be able to log their time against the tasks and visual reports should be available in Trello for time spent."

"The documentation is not readily accessible. It is difficult to connect with technical support. Additionally, their knowledge base seems limited."

"Trello was a little complicated initially because we didn't know how to use it, create a product backlog, or define the work items."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The tool's pricing is average."

"Paying for the solution's license is worth it only if our enterprise or organization can use Trello, integrated with some other solution, and we can have good reports."

"I am tinkering with the free version."

"The pricing for this solution is reasonable."

"Trello has a really good price."

"It is free."

"Its pricing is good. It is about $6 per license for what we use, but then there are other plans as well, such as $12 a month. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of pricing."

"I do believe that Trello has a licensed version, but I used the free version of the tool with limited capabilities."