Ping Identity Platform vs SAP Data Governance comparison

Ping Identity and SAP are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ping Identity is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while SAP is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. Ping Identity holds a 0.3% mindshare in DG, compared to SAP’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

115 Views
53 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Data Governance

Read 2 SAP Data Governance reviews

392 Views
254 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

SAP Data Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and SAP Data Governance compete in the security and data management category. Ping Identity is favored for its seamless access management, while SAP Data Governance is recognized for its comprehensive data control.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers adaptive authentication, strong identity management, and API security. SAP Data Governance focuses on data quality, integration, and compliance, providing extensive control over data processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Data Governance has a structured deployment model and extensive support, enhancing data governance implementation. Ping Identity Platform provides flexible deployment options, adaptable to various IT environments, and is noted for its versatility.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform generally has a lower initial setup cost, appealing for quicker ROI. SAP Data Governance requires a higher upfront investment but offers a strong ROI through its extensive data oversight and compliance features, suitable for enterprises prioritizing data management.

To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Data Governance Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Data Governance

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), Authentication Systems (7th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

SAP Data Governance

Ranking in Data Governance

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Data Governance is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Vijaya Macherla

GTM Lead at Capgemini

A robust solution that establishes rules, policies, and procedures

The solution is used in Life Cycle Data Management where it can be stored in cheaper storage options like Amazon and OpenShift. It has helped with data retention It is robust solution. SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements. I have experience with SAP…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It offers robust features and customization options that justify the cost."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

"The new workflow engine is based on the web app rather than the Java-based approach."

"It is robust solution."

Cons

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

"The product is not customizable."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"One significant challenge was ensuring smooth user migration during system upgrades in Ping."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

"I would like to see harmonizing with some of the external third-party products so that it will all be within SAP."

"SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Retailer

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Data Governance?

It is robust solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Data Governance?

SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Data Governance?

The solution is used in Life Cycle Data Management where it can be stored in cheaper storage options like Amazon and OpenShift. It has helped with data retention.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 18% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs SAP Data Governance

Compared 85% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Data Governance

Compared 15% of the time

More SAP Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

June 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

June 2025

Download SAP Data Governance product report

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

No data available

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

SAP Data Governance helps consolidate and centrally govern the master data lifecycle of information across the organization. Key benefits: Consolidate and manage master data across the business, whether information is exchanged and accessed in SAP or non-SAP solutions on premise or in the cloud. Uses prebuilt data models, rules, workflows, and user interfaces to quickly deploy tasks such as financial consolidation, customer service, and supplier onboarding. And supports all your master data domains in one single application, and implement it in an on-premise, cloud, or hybrid environment.

SAP

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., The VELUX Group, Asian Paints, AOK Bundesverband, EMC Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Data Governance

June 2025

Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.