Pinecone vs SingleStore comparison

Pinecone and SingleStore are both solutions in the Vector Databases category. Pinecone is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while SingleStore is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. Pinecone holds a 7.5% mindshare in VD, compared to SingleStore’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pinecone users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SingleStore users who would recommend it.

Pinecone

Read 7 Pinecone reviews

2,977 Views
2,977 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SingleStore

Read 6 SingleStore reviews

2,197 Views
593 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pinecone

SingleStore

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

SingleStore and Pinecone are key players in the database management space, each offering unique benefits. SingleStore tends to lead in analytics and real-time data handling, while Pinecone stands out in vector search performance.

Features: SingleStore features a distributed SQL engine enabling high-speed transactions and complex queries. Its real-time analytics and support for high concurrency through horizontal scaling make it ideal for businesses focused on rapid data analysis. On the other side, Pinecone offers robust vector database technology, which is highly efficient for similarity search, advanced machine learning integration, and decentralizing data storage to enhance performance.

Room for Improvement: SingleStore could enhance its learning curve for non-SQL users and improve tool integration for seamless user experience. Pinecone may benefit from more competitive initial setup costs, better ease of use for non-developers, and efficiency in handling structured dataset integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SingleStore provides versatile deployment options and comprehensive support for smoother system integrations, making it suitable for various business needs. Pinecone focuses on simplifying and speeding up deployment, which is attractive for developers working on AI-driven projects. Their customer service is designed to facilitate rapid implementation.

Pricing and ROI: SingleStore offers scalable pricing structures that aim to optimize spending, giving businesses targeting analytical workloads a significant ROI. Pinecone, while potentially costlier initially, is expected to deliver robust ROI where its superior vector search capabilities align with business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Pinecone vs. SingleStore Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pinecone vs. SingleStore

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pinecone

Ranking in Vector Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SingleStore

Ranking in Vector Databases

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Pinecone is 7.5%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SingleStore is 2.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vector Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pinecone	7.5%
SingleStore	2.0%
Other	90.5%

Vector Databases

Featured Reviews

Pcg Guripati

Chief Technology Advisor at Kovaad technologies Pvt Ltd

Faced challenges with metadata filtering but have achieved reliable long-term memory for chat applications

We were looking at multiple options for a vector database, and we found Pinecone to be the easiest to integrate into our solution. Plus, it has a very generous free tier, which helps us as a startup. The best features Pinecone offers are quick setup and good indexing for us. The retrieval mechanisms are fast, and the integration with Python as with JavaScript and TypeScript libraries that Pinecone provides are very robust. Authentication is also very good. The namespaces feature allows us to break down or store data for each user separately, reducing interference and maintaining privacy as an important feature. Pinecone has positively impacted our organization by enhancing efficiency for the team, and the long-term effect has been that the chats have become much more personalized due to the memory added through a vector database. We are seeing that the trainees getting trained on the platform are more satisfied with the results or messages generated by AI.

Read full review

Yasin Sarı

Senior Data Analyst at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

High-speed data processing, seamless scalability, and excellent high availability making it an optimal choice for those prioritizing performance and efficiency in a database solution

There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks. Attempting to use it for direct extraction, for instance, might lead to memory-related challenges. While MySQL version five might lack extensive SQL capabilities, SingleStore also has its constraints, requiring simpler SQL writing. This becomes evident when seeking advanced functionalities like window functions or JSON functions, where SingleStore doesn't offer an extensive toolkit, necessitating a more straightforward approach to SQL.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are similarity search and maximal marginal relevance search for retrieval purposes."

"The best thing about Pinecone is its private local host feature. It displays all the maintenance parameters and lets us view the data sent to the database. We can also see the status of the CD and which application it corresponds to."

"The semantic search capability is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Pinecone is its managed service aspect. There are many vector databases available, but Pinecone stands out in the market. It is very flexible, allowing us to input any kind of data dimensions into the platform. This makes it easy to use for both technical and non-technical users."

"The product's setup phase was easy."

"Pinecone has positively impacted our organization by enhancing efficiency for the team, and the long-term effect has been that the chats have become much more personalized due to the memory added through a vector database."

"We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases."

"It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data."

"MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines."

"The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed."

"The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms."

"The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown."

Cons

"One major issue I have noticed with Pinecone is that it does not allow me to search based on metadata."

"I want to suggest that Pinecone requires a login and API key, but I would prefer not to have a login system and to use the environment directly."

"For testing purposes, the product should offer support locally as it is one area where the tool has shortcomings."

"One major issue I have noticed with Pinecone is that it does not allow me to search based on metadata."

"Onboarding could be better and smoother."

"The tool does not confirm whether a file is deleted or not."

"The product fails to offer a serverless type of storage capacity."

"Pinecone can be made more budget-friendly."

"Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial."

"We don't get good discounts in Pakistan."

"There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great."

"It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks."

"Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally."

"For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is relatively cheaper than other vector DBs in the market."

"Pinecone is not cheap; it's actually quite expensive. We find that using Pinecone can raise our budget significantly. On the other hand, using open-source options is more budget-friendly."

"I have experience with the tool's free version."

"I think Pinecone is cheaper to use than other options I've explored. However, I also remember that they offer a paid version."

"The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."

"I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."

"They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."

"SingleStore is a bit expensive."

"Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pinecone?

We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pinecone?

One major issue I have noticed with Pinecone is that it does not allow me to search based on metadata. This can cause problems because while vector indexing or vector search is good, if you populat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pinecone?

My main use case for Pinecone involves storage of chat data, specifically chat transcripts, and retrieval of matched chat messages. We store chat transcripts as vectors in Pinecone. When we have a ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SingleStore DB?

The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SingleStore DB?

Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SingleStore DB?

See all answers

Comparisons

Supabase Vector vs Pinecone

Compared 30% of the time

OpenSearch vs Pinecone

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Pinecone

Compared 13% of the time

LanceDB vs Pinecone

Compared 7% of the time

ClickHouse vs Pinecone

Compared 1% of the time

More Pinecone Competitors

ClickHouse vs SingleStore

Compared 10% of the time

SQL Server vs SingleStore

Compared 8% of the time

Supabase Vector vs SingleStore

Compared 7% of the time

CockroachDB vs SingleStore

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs SingleStore

Compared 6% of the time

More SingleStore Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pinecone

October 2025

Download Pinecone product report

Buyer's Guide

SingleStore

October 2025

Download SingleStore product report

Overview

Pinecone is a powerful tool for efficiently storing and retrieving vector embeddings. It is highly praised for its scalability, speed, and ease of integration with existing workflows.

Users find it particularly useful for similarity search, recommendation systems, and natural language processing.

Its efficient search capabilities, seamless integration with existing systems, and ability to handle large-scale datasets make it a valuable tool for data analysis and retrieval.

Pinecone

SingleStore delivers the performance you need for enterprise AI, providing the most performant data platform for apps and analytics at scale. SingleStore enables organizations to scale from one to one million customers in one unified platform. SingleStore offers transparent pricing as shown here https://www.singlestore.com/pricing/

SingleStore caters to over 400 customers globally, including major banks and tech companies in 50+ countries and 40+ verticals. It offers seamless scaling for both transactional and analytical workloads, simplifying data management with its MySQL compatibility and real-time processing capabilities. SingleStore's distributed architecture ensures speed and reliability, efficiently handling large data volumes.

What are the key features of SingleStore?

MySQL Compatibility: Eases the learning curve for users.
Built-in Pipelines: Connects to S3, Kafka, and more.
High Concurrency: Processes billions of records swiftly.
Replication & Failover: Enhances speed and reliability.
In-memory Storage: Ensures data safety and quick access.

What benefits can users find in SingleStore reviews?

Automatic Reconfiguration: Simplifies management tasks.
Impressive SQL Performance: Supports complex queries efficiently.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with a multi-node setup.

Top banks and fintech companies leverage SingleStore for efficient management of financial data, while media and telecom industries use it for scalable metadata management and improved data processing. Retail and eCommerce sectors benefit from enhanced transactional capabilities, reducing the need for separate databases and optimizing reporting processes. SingleStore's capacity to unite diverse workloads makes it a strategic choice across many sectors.

SingleStore

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. DoorDash 3. Instacart 4. Lyft 5. Pinterest 6. Reddit 7. Slack 8. Snapchat 9. Spotify 10. TikTok 11. Twitter 12. Uber 13. Zoom 14. Adobe 15. Amazon 16. Apple 17. Facebook 18. Google 19. IBM 20. Microsoft 21. Netflix 22. Salesforce 23. Shopify 24. Square 25. Tesla 26. TikTok 27. Twitch 28. Uber Eats 29. WhatsApp 30. Yelp 31. Zillow 32. Zynga

400+ customers including: 6sense, Adobe, Akamai, Ant Money, Arcules, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DELL, DBS Bank, Dentsu, DirectlyApply, EY, Factors.AI, Fathom Analytics, FirstEnergy, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, impact.com, Kroger, LG, LiveRamp, Lumana, Nvidia, OpenDialog, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, PicPay, RBC, Samsung, SegMetrics, Siemens, SiteImprove, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, SONY, STC, SunRun, TATA, Thorn, ZoomInfo.

Buyer's Guide

Pinecone vs. SingleStore

September 2025

Free Report: Pinecone vs. SingleStore

Find out what your peers are saying about Pinecone vs. SingleStore and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pinecone vs. SingleStore report.

See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.

We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.