Pentera vs RedSeal comparison

"Surface provides automated validation and penetration testing features with a proactive, continuous, and highly realistic approach to cybersecurity validation, helping organizations understand and reduce their true cyber exposure."

"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."

"The product is easy to use."

"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."

"The tool showed us that our ransomware protection wasn’t working on some machines."

"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."

"Pentera has many authentic features."

"The platform's most valuable features are credential management and vulnerability management."

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."

"The price could be improved."

"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."

"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."

"The automated penetration testing features must be improved."

"The licensing and IP management need improvement. When the IP is imported into a system, we cannot withdraw or revoke the license."

"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."

"One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"The tool is relatively cheap."

"It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."

"The product's cost is reasonable. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."