Parasoft SOAtest and Snyk compete in the domain of software testing and security management. Snyk seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration with DevOps tools and focus on simplifying vulnerability management in code.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest is notable for its ability to set up complex functional test scenarios with support for multiple scripting languages and integrations that enhance API testing. It excels in web services and UI automation, particularly in areas like data-driven testing and virtualized services. Snyk stands out with its robust integration with DevOps tools, providing a user-friendly platform that emphasizes vulnerability management in code. Its comprehensive vulnerability database and powerful notifications system make it highly developer-centered, allowing easy installation and minimal account management.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could benefit from enhanced report clarity, user interface updates, and improved third-party integration due to its complex interface and steep learning curve. Users have reported performance and memory management issues. Snyk might improve by adding features like static application security testing and enhancing report clarity. Users also desire broader language support and a more straightforward hierarchical structure to align better with developer priorities without overwhelming them with alerts.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is generally deployed on-premises and offers excellent technical support, although location-based challenges are noted. Snyk, with its flexible cloud platform deployments, receives favorable feedback for customer service and technical support. However, some users mention limited documentation and challenges in fully understanding its potential.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is seen as expensive with complex licensing but offers high ROI through its comprehensive capabilities, especially in end-to-end automation. Snyk, competitively priced, provides scalable models that reflect usage, appealing to cost-conscious organizations while delivering significant value. Its open-source options offer accessibility and scalability suitable for various company sizes.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Both Veracode and Snyk should implement this new scoring system for CVSS and AIVSS.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
The best feature of Snyk is the integration with our ticketing system, which is Jira.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
