Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] vs TerminalFour Site Manager comparison

OpenText and TerminalFour are both solutions in the Web Content Management category.
TerminalFour Site Manager
Read 1 TerminalFour Site Manager review
  • 146 Views
  • 102 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] and TerminalFour Site Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, Wordpress and others in Web Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,579 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Web Site Managemen...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TerminalFour Site Manager
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Web Content Management (20th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use OpenText Web Site Management [EOL]?
Share your opinion
SG
TerminalFour Site Manager Review
Introduction Vendor History TerminalFour was founded in 1996 by the then-Dublin City University student Piero Tintori. What started off as a few one-off projects in Ireland gradually developed into solution that is now known as Site Manager. This development was done in collaboration with…
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, Wordpress and others in Web Content Management. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
WordPress vs TerminalFour Site Manager Logo
WordPress vs TerminalFour Site Manager
Compared 100% of the time
More TerminalFour Site Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2025
OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] reportDownload OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2025
TerminalFour Site Manager reportDownload TerminalFour Site Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Web Site Management
Site Manager
 

Overview

OpenText Web Site Management gives you the ability to deliver information directly to users, within context, across multiple and multi-lingual channels. OpenText Web Site Management can create a richer, more interactive online experience, crossing the boundaries between websites, mobile devices, intranets, social networks, and Internet channels.
OpenText
TERMINALFOUR Site Manager includes a wide range of Intranet, Social Media and Web 2.0 modules at no extra cost: Blogging, Forms, Microsites, Discussions, Commenting, Polls, GIS/Mapping, Videos, Social Tagging and Personalised Portals.
TerminalFour
 

Sample Customers

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Givaudan, Anglian Water, Schweizerische Mobiliar Versicherungsgesellschaft AG, Karl Franzens Universit_t Graz, Miele, City of Edmonton, The Mosaic Company, Lone Star College System, St. Lucie County, City of Surrey, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), Sloan Valve, Detroit Diesel
University Administration ,Loyola,swinburne University ,Rhodes University ,rmit University,University college dublin,University of florida
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, Wordpress and others in Web Content Management. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.