OpenText UFT One and Postman cater to different aspects of software testing. Postman seems to have the upper hand due to better overall user feedback and faster return on investment.
Features: OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation, integration with various development environments, and comprehensive functional testing. Postman is favored for ease of use, extensive API testing features, and collaboration tools. Users find Postman's features more intuitive and practical compared to OpenText UFT One.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One needs better performance, more modern options, and an easier interface. Postman users seek enhancements in response time, minor improvements in the testing environment, and better offline capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One faces challenges with its complex deployment and requires considerable effort. Customer service receives mixed reviews. Postman enjoys straightforward deployment and better user feedback for customer support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is often seen as expensive with a slower ROI. Postman is more affordable, providing good value and quicker ROI according to user feedback.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
This feature would allow the response to be validated in the database as well.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
I taught my business analyst to use it. I just showed them once, and it was easy for them to understand.
Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.
Read white paper
Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
