OpenText UFT One and Panaya Test Dynamix compete in the software testing industry. OpenText UFT One stands out with its robust feature set, while Panaya Test Dynamix appeals through its efficient deployment model and ease of use.
Features: OpenText UFT One includes advanced scripting capabilities, broad technology support, and a versatile automation framework. Panaya Test Dynamix focuses on agility with code-free testing and accelerated test cycles, enhancing productivity for teams unfamiliar with scripting.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One could improve its setup process and broaden its customer support approach. Additionally, offering more affordable pricing tiers might enhance its market position. Panaya Test Dynamix can improve by providing more advanced testing features and integrating more comprehensive reporting tools. Enhancing scalability for larger projects could also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One requires a more complex setup and offers traditional customer service. Panaya Test Dynamix provides a cloud-based, straightforward deployment model with proactive and responsive support, facilitating user onboarding efficiently.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One involves a higher initial cost justified by its extensive capabilities and long-term benefits in complex environments. Panaya Test Dynamix is a cost-effective alternative, offering faster ROI through its efficient deployment and simple testing process.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.
Read white paper
Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.
With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
