We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The solution is very stable."
"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The solution should be cheaper."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.