OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Uptycs comparison

OpenText and Uptycs are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #41, while Uptycs is ranked #65. OpenText holds a 1.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to Uptycs’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uptycs users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Uptycs compete in the cybersecurity industry. Uptycs has the upper hand due to its advanced analytics and infrastructure visibility.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides robust endpoint security, including malware blocking, threat intelligence integration, and policy management. Uptycs offers cloud-native security analytics and comprehensive visibility across infrastructures, along with an emphasis on analytics capabilities.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: Uptycs provides a seamless cloud deployment model that reduces complexity and setup time, along with proactive customer service. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers extensive documentation and support but might require more effort during initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection presents a moderate setup cost with strong return potential and competitive support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Uptycs, priced higher, offers value through advanced features and visibility, targeting those seeking comprehensive security insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,258 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uptycs is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.6%
Uptycs	0.4%
Other	94.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

SangramGupta

Security Consultant at Deloitte USI

Centralized visibility has improved risk-based vulnerability management but onboarding still needs simplification

From my perspective, the features of Uptycs that stand out more for my projects and organization are the vulnerability management, endpoint visibility, and asset inventory management features. I can share two specific outcomes that show this positive impact using Uptycs. First, it reduces significant time and effort from the asset inventory point of view because previously I needed to scan all of the assets which were in scope, but now I only scan those assets that are currently active and in scope, and the CMDB and asset inventory receive proper updates of those assets. Secondly, in vulnerability prioritization, I receive all the prioritized vulnerabilities so I can prioritize and mitigate or remediate them as soon as possible, which reduces the overall time of remediation as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud, it makes it better to use for everybody, it allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security, and this sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"The main benefit of using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks while employing Palo Alto Firewall at the internet edge is that it improves security on our endpoint devices, integrating seamlessly with Palo Alto Firewalls to deliver comprehensive network, analyst, and security details all in a single dashboard, which allows us to manage everything from our network devices."

"It detected stuff that other things wouldn't detect."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to other people."

"Cortex is a very good total solution on the endpoints."

"Stability is one of the features we like the most."

"I have found the solution to be very easy in respect of the integration and configurable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is that they have the lightest agent, as it is only six MBs, installs in a matter of seconds, is very lightweight, and has a very minimal, negligible performance impact on the machine and endpoints."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

"The solution is very light, works well on our PCs, the dashboard is very good, and we find the pricing to be very affordable."

"The solution is very simple and straightforward to use."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"They have multiple great features."

"I have seen a return on investment from using Uptycs, saving almost 25 to 30 percent in terms of asset investigations or asset inventory management and vulnerability prioritization, which is significant."

Cons

"The dashboard is the area that needs to improve so that we can have the ability to drill down without having to go elsewhere to verify results."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"Every 30 or 40 days, there's a new version and we need to go and make sure our customer's laptops are upgraded."

"It is an enterprise-level solution. Its price could be less expensive."

"However, if you do not have Palo Alto in your environment, you are paying these additional services just for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, so it is not a cost-effective solution."

"It is a complex solution to implement."

"I think sometimes Cortex XDR agent automatically stops event capturing from the device, and then even the dashboard does not get any notifications from the agent."

"There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around. In the hotel industry, we use a different type of data versus Oracle and SQL. By default, there are some policies which stop us from running properly. Because of this, the support level is also not that strong. We have to wait to get a results."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades."

"Regarding improvements for Uptycs, I suggest simplified onboarding for complex cloud environments because the current onboarding method is complex and requires checks with the support team."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Very costly product."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"I am using the Community edition."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"The pricing is high."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"It is relatively cheap."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's adverti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the con...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 40% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Uptycs

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Uptycs

Compared 14% of the time

Wiz vs Uptycs

Compared 11% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs Uptycs

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Uptycs

Compared 4% of the time

More Uptycs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

May 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

June 2026

Download Uptycs product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Uptycs is a security analytics platform designed to enhance visibility and control across cloud, container, and endpoint assets. It helps organizations efficiently manage security risks with scalable analytics.

Uptycs offers extensive monitoring capabilities, providing a unified view of security data to identify threats and vulnerabilities. Its scalable architecture supports cloud environments and on-premise deployments, allowing teams to visualize security threats and ensure compliance effectively. Uptycs integrates seamlessly with existing workflows, offering real-time insights and enabling prompt response to potential threats.

What are the key features of Uptycs?

Endpoint Detection: Monitors and detects anomalies at the endpoint level.
Threat Intelligence: Integrates threat data to illuminate potential risks.
Compliance Reporting: Automates compliance checks and reports.
Cloud Security: Secures cloud infrastructure across multiple providers.
Container Security: Provides visibility into Docker and Kubernetes environments.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced threat detection and incident responses.
Cost Effectiveness: Reduces resources needed for security management.
Streamlined Processes: Integrates with tools to simplify workflows.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry standards, minimizing regulatory risks.

Uptycs is implemented across industries needing robust security measures, such as finance, healthcare, and technology. It addresses unique security challenges by offering tailored solutions that support secure digital transformations.

Uptycs

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mytech Partners

Comcast, Crossbeam, Flexport, Greenlight Financial, Lookout Security, PayNearMe

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.