Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs Trend Micro ServerProtect comparison

OpenText and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #50 with an average rating of 5.0, while Trend Micro is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trend Micro’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.
OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reviews
  • 1,774 Views
  • 1,579 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Trend Micro ServerProtect
Read 16 Trend Micro ServerProtect reviews
  • 2,110 Views
  • 2,068 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Trend Micro ServerProtect compete in endpoint and server protection. OpenText has an edge in ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, while Trend Micro offers advanced server-focused features.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection highlights a lightweight design, cloud-based management, and AI functionalities. Users value its low resource usage, quick deployment, and stability. Trend Micro ServerProtect focuses on server protection with virtual patching and anti-malware features. It's favored for managing virtual environments effectively.

Room for Improvement: OpenText users suggest better reporting, fewer false positives, and expanded analytics. Enhanced support and proactive threat detection are also desired. Trend Micro could improve integration capabilities, EDR visibility, and simplify deployment. Streamlined installations and broader integration are recommended.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText supports public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering flexibility. Its customer service is highly rated though some interaction improvements are suggested. Trend Micro provides diverse deployments with high customer satisfaction and robust technical support. Both excel in deployment options, but Trend Micro is noted for excellent service ratings.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is praised for being cost-effective with transparent, stable pricing suitable for various endpoint numbers. It's a budget-friendly option. Trend Micro's pricing varies with selected features and is perceived as pricier but appreciated for flexible licensing. OpenText offers affordability while Trend Micro provides comprehensive server protection with higher pricing.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
50th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Micro ServerProtect
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
40th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro ServerProtect is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trend Micro ServerProtect0.7%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​0.8%
Other98.5%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that offers good UI and documentation
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.
Read full review
Nagesh-Ng - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a single console to control all applications and URL filtering
I am satisfied with the malware detection capabilities of the solution. At our company, using the product we haven't found any incidents or threats that couldn't be easily resolved. Most of the customers of Trend Micro ServerProtect in our organization belong to the Healthcare industry. I have witnessed smooth integrations with Trend Micro ServerProtect. I haven't yet noticed any AI capabilities in the product. I would recommend others to adopt Trend Micro ServerProtect as it can be easily installed and managed. The product assists in administration. The solution is a perfect fit for the SMB segment. I would rate Trend Micro ServerProtect an eight out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."
"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."
"It is an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure product."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."
"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."
"Auto-Remediation"
"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pros
"The staff went above and beyond to make sure our experience was unforgettable, accommodating every request with a smile and genuine care."
"Able to quarantine any malware."
"Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too."
"It helps us quickly address potential issues and provides us with valuable insights."
"Technical support was perfect."
"The most valuable features are the anti-malware and antivirus capabilities."
"ServerProtect's best feature is virtual patching, which takes care of patching even if your servers aren't updated with the latest threat definitions."
"It can be managed from the cloud."
More Trend Micro ServerProtect pros
 

Cons

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."
"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."
"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."
"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."
"One of the biggest pain points is that it's not really ransomware-oriented. They will be able to catch some, but that's where Sentinel One is a better player compared to Webroot."
"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."
"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."
"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ cons
"Trend Micro is a little bit complicated when it comes to setting up special policies."
"Lacking analytics and a machine learning technique."
"Notifications are not very good with Trend Micro."
"One thing I have been facing is that some fake threats have appeared that even Trend Micro was not able to clear up. It couldn't tell you why these threats are happening, where they are coming from and what the costs are."
"The solution should provide features to block devices, specific IPs or URLs"
"There are a few areas of improvement. Despite its high performance, there are certain aspects related to the operating system that could be improved. Specifically, I find that the protection for certain actions requires more effort compared to other actions."
"Could include additional features such as an intrusion prevention system."
"No built-in vulnerability scanner for management solutions."
More Trend Micro ServerProtect cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."
"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."
"The pricing is high."
"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."
"The solution is very cost-effective."
"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."
"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."
"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pricing and cost advice
"Pricewise, this product is okay."
"In terms of price, the solution is in the middle; it's neither the cheapest nor the most expensive. I rate it three out of five for cost."
"Pricing is based on the components you choose from the suite to run in your installation. Costs vary by the number of features and the number of servers."
"This product has an annual subscription, but also offers MSP options."
"The product is available at a reasonable price"
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro ServerProtect?
I am aware of the price of this solution. The price is good, and the licensing is fair.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Trend Micro ServerProtect?
I cannot specify areas of improvement for this solution as I am not a security specialist. The aspect of needing deeper information is something I have noticed.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Trend Micro ServerProtect?
My primary use case for using Trend Micro ServerProtect is for server protection and endpoint protection.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 21% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 13% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 10% of the time
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 8% of the time
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Competitors
HP Wolf Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect Logo
HP Wolf Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect
Compared 18% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Micro ServerProtect Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Micro ServerProtect
Compared 17% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Micro ServerProtect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Micro ServerProtect
Compared 16% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trend Micro ServerProtect Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trend Micro ServerProtect
Compared 10% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Trend Micro ServerProtect Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Trend Micro ServerProtect
Compared 10% of the time
More Trend Micro ServerProtect Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
September 2025
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reportDownload OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ product report
Buyer's Guide
Trend Micro ServerProtect
September 2025
Trend Micro ServerProtect reportDownload Trend Micro ServerProtect product report
 

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, ServerProtect, ServerProtect for Storage
 

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
  • AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
  • Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
  • Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
  • Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic
What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
  • Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, powered by XGen security, leverages a blend of cross-generational threat protection techniques to safeguard a wide range of network attached storage systems by detecting and removing viruses and spyware in real time. This comprehensive storage security uses the industry-standard ICAP protocol to complement support for traditional RPC communication protocols. To simplify network protection for EMC, NetApp, and Hitachi Data Systems storage systems, ServerProtect for Storage provides automatic, incremental security updates and centralized management of servers via a web-based console.

Trend Micro
 

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners
Siemens
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect
September 2025
Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.