OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs Sentry comparison

OpenText and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sentry is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

414 Views
406 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 14 Sentry reviews

8,956 Views
8,419 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Sentry both offer robust business process management solutions. OpenText appears ideal for large-scale enterprises due to its comprehensive support and feature set, while Sentry stands out for its intuitive design and high user satisfaction.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring features extensive data integration, detailed customization options, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Sentry offers real-time analytics, ease of use, and straightforward workflows.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring needs improvements in scalability, user accessibility, and streamlined features. Sentry requires enhanced integration with third-party tools, comprehensive documentation, and better ongoing support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring's deployment is complex and time-consuming with thorough customer support. Sentry's deployment is rapid and less disruptive, but its proactive support could be improved.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring has higher upfront costs but offers a higher long-term ROI. Sentry has a more accessible pricing model with potentially higher ongoing costs and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Sentry Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Sentry

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

41st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 5.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sentry	5.8%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.2%
Other	94.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

Abdullah Baig

Software Dev at AF AB

An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing

Sentry was easy to learn compared to New Relic and Azure Monitor. I saw some valuable input. It took us the least amount of time to see how Sentry is valuable. It took just a few minutes. Session Replay provides a replay of the recorded errors. It is a good feature. Azure Monitor does not have this feature. The error reporting is straightforward. We can see everything that we need to see. The dashboard seems pretty fine. The product performs well. We can see the user's IP addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Overall, I give Sentry a rating of 10."

"The product performs well."

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs."

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"Sentry's performance monitoring has helped us understand where the bottlenecks are in our application and allowed us to optimize critical transactions for a faster user experience."

"The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides."

"It's a great visibility tool for the developer team."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location."

"One area where I think Sentry can improve is in the granularity of its alerting system, as it sometimes feels too sensitive or not customizable enough."

"Additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area of improvement."

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved."

"The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry."

"The price could be lowered."

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features."

"I would like to see a role registration feature added."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sentry?

The product performs well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Do you know anything about the pricing aspect, the licensing costs, setup cost of Sentry product?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

What would you like to see improved or enhanced in Sentry in the future? Are there any specific features that you would like to see included in the next releases of Sentry?

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 58% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 42% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 19% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 11% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Sentry

Compared 9% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.

Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.

What are the key features of Sentry?

Integration capabilities: Connects with Slack, GitLab, Jira, AWS Lambda.
Real-time error tracking: Alerts users instantly about errors.
Event grouping: Groups related errors for easier management.
Code trace logs: Provides detailed trace logs linked to Git repositories.
Comprehensive context: Offers a complete view of events and context.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Sentry?

Enhanced reliability: Provides critical insights for robust application performance.
Accessibility: Easy deployment and quick adaptation make it user-friendly.
Security: Maintains high security standards with timely updates.
Utility in error management: Detects silent failures, aiding ETL processes.
Cost efficiency: Favored over alternatives like New Relic due to comprehensive features.

In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.

Sentry

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Sentry

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.