TFS and OpenText ALM / Quality Center compete in the application lifecycle management and quality management category. OpenText ALM / Quality Center seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust defect management capabilities, despite TFS being more user-friendly.
Features: TFS is valued for its strong version control, agile project management, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products. OpenText ALM / Quality Center impresses users with its extensive test management, requirement tracking, and reporting capabilities. While TFS stands out for its collaborative tools and ease of use, OpenText ALM / Quality Center is preferred for its depth and versatility in managing complex testing environments.
Room for Improvement: Users mention that TFS could benefit from enhanced reporting features, better support for non-Microsoft environments, and expanded functionality. OpenText ALM / Quality Center users seek improvements in the initial setup process, more intuitive navigation options, and user experience enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS is praised for its straightforward deployment, especially within Microsoft-centric ecosystems, and its reliable customer support. OpenText ALM / Quality Center, although offering a powerful toolset, often requires more time and expertise to deploy effectively, with mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: TFS is often seen as cost-effective with a quicker return on investment due to its lower setup costs and subscription-based pricing model. OpenText ALM / Quality Center, though more expensive to implement, potentially offers a significant ROI for enterprises needing comprehensive testing and quality management solutions. Users generally find TFS to be budget-friendly, while those using OpenText ALM / Quality Center highlight its value despite the higher price point.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Integrating TFS with Visual Studio and Azure Cloud has improved our development processes by providing better integration and reducing errors.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
as a Microsoft product, it might have limited global documentation or support options compared to GitLab.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Its stability is lacking as we have encountered security leaks and glitches.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
TFS is not as fast, easy to use, or configurable as GitLab, despite moving into the cloud.
I am content with how TFS is structured now, particularly the Azure version.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
The integration with Azure DevOps also offers seamless functionality for CI/CD processes.
Makes it easier for me to create builds and release pipelines without needing to program YAML files.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
