OpenText Application Quality Management vs TD/OMS comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Remain Software are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Remain Software is ranked #40. OpenText holds a 8.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to Remain Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

22,317 Views
13,837 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

TD/OMS

455 Views
455 Comparison Views

OpenText Application Qualit...

TD/OMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management and TD/OMS are competing products in the realm of software quality and deployment. Although OpenText's pricing and support might seem advantageous, TD/OMS is perceived as superior due to its robust features and long-term value, making it worth the investment.

Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers streamlined test management, automation capabilities, and an enhanced software development cycle. TD/OMS provides integrated change management, CI/CD tools, and full integration options, resulting in broader functionality and a comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management provides a flexible deployment model that simplifies configuration and management practices, with responsive support noted for its effectiveness. TD/OMS has strong on-premises and cloud deployment strategies, ensuring a seamless implementation experience and consistent post-deployment assistance. The distinguishing factor is TD/OMS's versatility in deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management provides competitive setup costs and quick ROI through process efficiencies. TD/OMS, with a higher initial cost, promises substantial long-term ROI due to its comprehensive features and lifecycle optimization. The pivotal distinction is TD/OMS's focus on delivering value over time, justifying its premium pricing strategy.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,338 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

TD/OMS

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

40th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 8.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TD/OMS is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	8.5%
TD/OMS	0.4%
Other	91.1%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Use TD/OMS?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 24% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Rocket Aldon vs TD/OMS

Compared 46% of the time

More TD/OMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

October 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

November 2026

Download TD/OMS product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

No data available

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers a scalable, user-friendly interface with seamless automation tool integration, positioned to enhance test case management and defect tracking.

OpenText Application Quality Management provides comprehensive tools for scalable test management and effective defect management, supporting real-time tracking and detailed reporting. It empowers users with enhanced traceability between requirements, tests, and defects. The customization options and integration capabilities ensure adaptability for a broad range of testing requirements to support efficient test management, execution, and reporting. Improvements are necessary in requirements traceability, user interface updates, and integration with Agile and DevOps tools. Performance and reporting enhancements, browser compatibility, licensing, costs, and customer support remain areas for growth. Users manage test cycles, log defects, and maintain test cases, benefiting from the system's ability to record results for manual and automated testing. It facilitates regression and performance testing and supports software development lifecycle tracking to ensure comprehensive coverage.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Scalability: Adaptable to extensive testing needs.
Integration: Seamless compatibility with automation tools.
Test Case Management: Simplifies creation and management.
Defect Management: Effective tracking and resolution.
Real-time Tracking: Keeps testing processes up-to-date.
Reporting: Offers detailed insights.
Customization: Tailored to testing processes.

What benefits or ROI do users typically see?

Enhanced Traceability: Links requirements, tests, and defects.
Efficiency: Streamlined test management and execution.
Comprehensive Coverage: Ensures thorough requirement mapping.
Flexibility: Adapts to testing processes and tools.
Detailed Reporting: Offers insights for improvement.

OpenText Application Quality Management is widely implemented in industries focusing on test management, defect tracking, and requirements mapping. Companies utilize its capabilities to integrate with systems supporting regression and performance testing, effectively tracking phases of the software development lifecycle to ensure comprehensive requirements coverage and insightful reporting. Transitioning to newer versions and managing large projects are seen as opportunities for increased efficiency.

OpenText

TD/OMS is a cutting-edge software change and application lifecycle management tool, particularly for IBM i environments. It excels in change tracking, version control, and streamlined deployment, enhancing CI/CD operations.

Key features include robust version management, integration with multiple platforms, and automated tracking for better compliance. Users report significant improvements in organizational efficiency, workflow, and collaboration, fostering enhanced communication and optimized operational practices.

Remain Software

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

November 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.