OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs QualiWare X comparison

OpenText and QualiWare are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3, while QualiWare is ranked #46. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to QualiWare’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

805 Views
757 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QualiWare X

Read 3 QualiWare X reviews

827 Views
438 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

QualiWare X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and QualiWare X compete in enterprise content management and business modeling. QualiWare X may have the upper hand with a superior feature set that justifies a higher investment.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is known for its seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, robust document management, and effective version control. QualiWare X provides enterprise architecture modeling, process optimization, and risk management, valuable for organizations focused on strategic analysis and planning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers a straightforward deployment, particularly smooth for organizations within Microsoft environments, bolstered by dependable customer service. QualiWare X provides a more customizable deployment that caters to diverse organizational needs, though it might be complex, requiring technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is a cost-effective option with competitive ROI, ideal for businesses leveraging Microsoft investments. QualiWare X has a higher initial setup cost, but it offers significant ROI potential, especially for enterprises utilizing its comprehensive modeling and optimization tools.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QualiWare X

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

46th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	0.9%
QualiWare X	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Gavin Bérubé

Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive

We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material. I like the solution's traceability. The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The overall benefit I get from using this solution is developing in a more secure environment with distributed architecture and even distribution of work across resources where full control on the code and repository is required."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

"The benefits that OpenText 360 for SharePoint has brought to my company include improved turnaround time."

"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"I like the solution's traceability."

Cons

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"It has a reasonable price."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Government

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X

Compared 14% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs QualiWare X

Compared 14% of the time

ARIS BPA vs QualiWare X

Compared 11% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs QualiWare X

Compared 10% of the time

LeanIX vs QualiWare X

Compared 10% of the time

More QualiWare X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

January 2026

Download QualiWare X product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

No data available

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.

QualiWare

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.