No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs QualiWare X comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
19th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QualiWare X
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
48th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint1.2%
QualiWare X0.8%
Other98.0%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

SB
Senior BI Lead at Cognizant
Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities
The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.
Gavin Bérubé - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive
We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material.  I like the solution's traceability.  The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"The benefits that OpenText 360 for SharePoint has brought to my company include improved turnaround time."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform, as it is a customizable product that fits your needs."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"OpenText Process 360 is modular and has more features than other products from a financial point of view."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"I like the solution's traceability."
"Enterprise architecture and a positive sense of understanding soon reached everyone."
"It is stable and easy to use."
 

Cons

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"To be honest, my experience with OpenText is that usually, they are not doing too much on quality assurance with their product."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
"In the previous version, the web interface was unstable."
"I was not so satisfied with arrows in this program."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
"On-premises version is expensive"
"The solution has a very complex pricing model."
"SharePoint uses a subscription model."
"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
"It has a reasonable price."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Construction Company
8%
Government
23%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise9
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.