We performed a comparison between OpenShift and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Scaling and uptime of the applications are positives."
"It is a stable platform."
"OpenShift offers more stability than Kubernetes."
"We have found the cluster management function to be very good with this product."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the great customer service and the ability for our team to get assistance when we need it."
"I like OCP, and the management UI is better than the open-source ones."
"The scalability of OpenShift combined with Kubernetes is good. At least from the software standpoint, it becomes quite easy to handle the scalability through configuration. You need to constantly monitor the underlying infrastructure and ensure that it has adequate provisioning. If you have enough infrastructure, then managing the scalability is quite easy which is done through configuration."
"The most valuable feature is the auto scalers for all microservices. The feature allows us to place request limits and it is much cheaper than AWS."
"To be able to define multiple sub accounts in order to accommodate and separate development, test, and productive environments."
"The solution can scale."
"The pre-delivered content from the SAP cloud platform is definitely a strength."
"It’s great that we have the entire suite of SAP at our fingertips."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"The ability to build custom applications on the BTP platform, reducing customization on the SAP HANA system and improving performance and management."
"SAP is an excellent company with an excellent reputation, excellent products, and dedicated customer support."
"The product improved our company's business operations since we got value out of it."
"We want to see better alerting, especially in critical situations requiring immediate intervention. Until we go to the dashboard, it can be challenging to quickly recognize that there's an issue for us to deal with. Therefore, a popup of the event or a tweaked GUI to catch our attention when it's alerting would be a welcome change. Everything else is good. We don't need any additional features. From the operations perspective, as an administrator, there is nothing concerning."
"We need some kind of a multi-cluster management solution from the Red Hat site."
"The metrics in OpenShift can use improvement."
"The monitoring part could be better to monitor the performance."
"Needs work on volume handling (although this is already better with GlusterFS). Security (SSSD) would also be an improvement."
"It would be great if it supported Bitbucket repositories too."
"This solution could be improved by offering best practices on standardization and additional guidance on how to use this solution."
"The solution only offers support for one server."
"My impression of the stability is that it is not good. Almost every month there is something new and that makes us nervous about delivery."
"The areas I think this solution should improve are monitoring and adapting."
"The addition of more industry use cases would be an improvement."
"While it was good for a small entity, it was not ideal for a large enterprise."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"What I would like to see improved is the learning curve."
"I've observed a few bugs in SAP. One recent bug I found in Content Modifier is that when using a predefined header to call the current date, it prints the previous date. These are small bugs I found."
OpenShift is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 53 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 6th in PaaS Clouds with 38 reviews. OpenShift is rated 8.4, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenShift writes "Provides us with the flexibility and efficiency of cloud-native stacks while enabling us to meet regulatory constraints". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". OpenShift is most compared with Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and Heroku, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and Pivotal Cloud Foundry. See our OpenShift vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
