No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenSearch vs Supabase Vector comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenSearch
Ranking in Vector Databases
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (15th)
Supabase Vector
Ranking in Vector Databases
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of OpenSearch is 5.5%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supabase Vector is 6.3%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Supabase Vector6.3%
OpenSearch5.5%
Other88.2%
Vector Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Use OpenSearch?
Leave a review
Alberto Hidalgo - PeerSpot reviewer
Co-Founder
Vector search has reduced duplicate citizen proposals and empowers richer democratic participation
I had problems integrating the vector directly into Supabase, so I had to use Google Vertex to generate the embeddings and the information I needed in the database. It would be nice if all of this could be integrated all in one place with Supabase. I would prefer not to have to use a different or external tool to create these embeddings. It would be nice to have everything integrated in the same way. Apart from that, I think that is one of the cons I found, but it is basic. That was my main concern in that regard. My advice for others looking into using Supabase Vector is to take into account how you are going to create the embeddings, as it is not an option implemented straight away in Supabase. You will need to handle the embeddings with an external tool, so make sure to consider how these integrations are going to be made.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
6%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Supabase Vector?
I do not feel anything special about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; we just regularly pay whatever we need, and I do not feel much difference.
What needs improvement with Supabase Vector?
One improvement I feel Supabase Vector could benefit from is that Supabase SDK stands out when comparing with a conventional Postgres SDK, and it would be even nicer if we could have a more direct ...
What is your primary use case for Supabase Vector?
Our main use case for Supabase Vector is to use pgvector as the vector database solution to store our embeddings for large language model applications. A specific example of how I'm using Supabase ...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Amazon 2. Netflix 3. Yelp 4. Adobe 5. IBM 6. Microsoft 7. Cisco 8. Oracle 9. Salesforce 10. eBay 11. Spotify 12. Airbnb 13. Twitter 14. LinkedIn 15. Pinterest 16. Slack 17. Dropbox 18. Expedia 19. Uber 20. Lyft 21. Square 22. Zillow 23. Reddit 24. Hulu 25. Twitch 26. Booking.com 27. Etsy 28. Groupon 29. StubHub 30. TripAdvisor 31. Wayfair 32. Zappos
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Redis, Qdrant and others in Vector Databases. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.