Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OP5 Monitor vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

ITRS and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ITRS is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zenoss is ranked #76. ITRS holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.
OP5 Monitor
Read 6 OP5 Monitor reviews
  • 1,099 Views
  • 865 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Zenoss Cloud
Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews
  • 633 Views
  • 444 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and OP5 Monitor are key competitors in network monitoring solutions. Zenoss Cloud seems to have the upper hand in scalability and automation, while OP5 Monitor excels in customizability and detailed on-premise features.

Features:Zenoss Cloud offers advanced cloud-native monitoring tools focusing on scalability, automation, and seamless integration with existing cloud services. It enables proactive infrastructure management with real-time insights. OP5 Monitor provides robust on-premise solutions prioritizing customizability and detailed performance tracking, offering the ability to tailor monitoring solutions for specific organizational needs and in-depth analysis of system health.

Room for Improvement:Zenoss Cloud could improve its cost structure for smaller enterprises, enhance offline capabilities, and streamline integration for non-cloud services. OP5 Monitor could offer more flexible subscription models to reduce initial costs, increase user interface intuitiveness, and enhance remote management capabilities, especially for distributed teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Zenoss Cloud features a streamlined, cloud-based deployment process, simplifying remote configuration with efficient customer support for rapid issue resolution. OP5 Monitor requires a more traditional on-premise setup with more initial effort but offers deep customization and highly technical customer service expertise.

Pricing and ROI:Zenoss Cloud uses a subscription model that may involve higher recurring costs but offers significant ROI due to its scalability and integration benefits. OP5 Monitor typically presents lower monthly costs with potentially higher initial setup expenses, but provides considerable ROI through its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and customization. Specific pricing details depend on organizational needs and scale.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OP5 Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OP5 Monitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
38th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
38th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
76th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
53rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (33rd), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (23rd), Container Monitoring (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), AIOps (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Harish Venkateshappa - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful online resources, customizable, and highly effective monitoring
The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users. If there are corrupt files the data can be extracted from them. Anyone who wants to see the performance of memory usage, such as whether it's at 80 to 90 percent, can use this tool. However, other tools can provide this information in two minutes, this tool is more time-consuming and the report it provides is not very effective for practical use. When it comes to reports, the tool falls short. During a recent call, it was noted that while the company has distributed servers across the globe, only the master server can accommodate the reports and events, causing delays. If other servers experience issues, the team cannot view the reporting or tag things, such as for troubleshooting purposes. If this aspect was improved it would be an excellent tool.
Read full review
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."
"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."
"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."
"We can also observe whatever we want, and there are no limitations."
"It monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users. It could be everything from monitoring disk space to CPU usage to memory. It could include determining if the response time in your e-commerce platform is quick enough, or whether you have too many bounces from some of the pages on your website. You want to monitor anything that could cost you money or time or resources. You can do that with this system. It's very flexible."
"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."
"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."
"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."
"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."
"It's easy to use."
"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."
"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."
 

Cons

"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."
"They need to improve the dashboard interface."
"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."
"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."
"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."
"We do not get performance reports properly."
"The AI aspect needs to improve."
"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."
"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."
"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."
"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."
"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"
"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."
"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."
"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."
"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."
"It depends on the customer, what he wants."
"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 27% of the time
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 22% of the time
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 20% of the time
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
More OP5 Monitor Competitors
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 38% of the time
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 35% of the time
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 15% of the time
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 12% of the time
More Zenoss Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor
April 2025
OP5 Monitor reportDownload OP5 Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Zenoss Cloud
April 2025
Zenoss Cloud reportDownload Zenoss Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Overview

OP5 Monitor - The Complete Monitoring Solution

OP5 Monitor is a flexible and highly scalable monitoring solution for all sizes of environments. Use just one product to monitor your IT environment regardless of location, whether on-premise, in dynamic environments, public cloud or a hybrid of these.

Digital transformation adds extra layers and complexity to the IT estate by creating a hybrid IT environment of both static and dynamic environments, that can be difficult to monitor efficiently. ITRS OP5 Monitor gives enterprises full visibility over their entire IT estate through a single pane of glass, allowing them to consolidate monitoring tools and cut down costs.

ITRS
Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.
Zenoss
 

Sample Customers

Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud
April 2025
Free Report: OP5 Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about OP5 Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OP5 Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.