Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OP5 Monitor vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

ITRS and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ITRS is ranked #70, while OpenText is ranked #61 with an average rating of 8.0. ITRS holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
OP5 Monitor
Read 6 OP5 Monitor reviews
  • 1,078 Views
  • 852 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 266 Views
  • 129 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

OP5 Monitor and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network monitoring field. OpenText Network Operations Management has an edge in advanced features, making it worthy of its higher price tag, whereas OP5 Monitor is more competitive in pricing and support.

Features: OP5 Monitor offers real-time monitoring capabilities, customizable dashboards, and scalability for small to medium-sized environments. It allows users to efficiently track IT performance and adapt dashboards to meet their specific needs. OpenText Network Operations Management, however, provides extensive integrations, comprehensive analytics, and advanced automation features, designed for large and complex IT infrastructures, allowing organizations to integrate various systems seamlessly and analyze data effectively.

Room for Improvement: OP5 Monitor could improve by expanding its range of integrations, enhancing automation features, and refining its analytics capabilities to cater to more extensive environments. OpenText Network Operations Management may benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing the need for professional assistance, and offering more competitive pricing to appeal to smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OP5 Monitor is known for an easy installation process and responsive customer support that suits organizations looking for quick setup. It enables companies to deploy the system efficiently without needing extensive expertise. OpenText Network Operations Management provides significant customization and flexibility during deployment but might require a more extended setup time and professional help due to its complexity, making it more suitable for organizations with specialized IT resources.

Pricing and ROI: OP5 Monitor is often more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, ideal for smaller enterprises seeking good value. It allows these companies to maintain budget control while achieving reliable monitoring solutions. OpenText Network Operations Management has higher setup costs but promises better ROI for organizations with complex needs, attributed to its comprehensive feature set that can drive more significant productivity improvements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OP5 Monitor vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OP5 Monitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
70th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (53rd)
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
61st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Harish Venkateshappa - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful online resources, customizable, and highly effective monitoring
The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users. If there are corrupt files the data can be extracted from them. Anyone who wants to see the performance of memory usage, such as whether it's at 80 to 90 percent, can use this tool. However, other tools can provide this information in two minutes, this tool is more time-consuming and the report it provides is not very effective for practical use. When it comes to reports, the tool falls short. During a recent call, it was noted that while the company has distributed servers across the globe, only the master server can accommodate the reports and events, causing delays. If other servers experience issues, the team cannot view the reporting or tag things, such as for troubleshooting purposes. If this aspect was improved it would be an excellent tool.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."
"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."
"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."
"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."
"We can also observe whatever we want, and there are no limitations."
"It monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users. It could be everything from monitoring disk space to CPU usage to memory. It could include determining if the response time in your e-commerce platform is quick enough, or whether you have too many bounces from some of the pages on your website. You want to monitor anything that could cost you money or time or resources. You can do that with this system. It's very flexible."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
 

Cons

"They need to improve the dashboard interface."
"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."
"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."
"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."
"We do not get performance reports properly."
"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."
"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."
"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 27% of the time
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 21% of the time
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 20% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
More OP5 Monitor Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor
April 2025
OP5 Monitor reportDownload OP5 Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
April 2025
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

OP5 Monitor - The Complete Monitoring Solution

OP5 Monitor is a flexible and highly scalable monitoring solution for all sizes of environments. Use just one product to monitor your IT environment regardless of location, whether on-premise, in dynamic environments, public cloud or a hybrid of these.

Digital transformation adds extra layers and complexity to the IT estate by creating a hybrid IT environment of both static and dynamic environments, that can be difficult to monitor efficiently. ITRS OP5 Monitor gives enterprises full visibility over their entire IT estate through a single pane of glass, allowing them to consolidate monitoring tools and cut down costs.

ITRS

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
April 2025
Free Report: OP5 Monitor vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about OP5 Monitor vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OP5 Monitor vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.