We performed a comparison between OneTrust GRC and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Vendor Risk Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
OneTrust GRC is ranked 4th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 7 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. OneTrust GRC is rated 7.6, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Costly solution that may not guarantee ROI, but remains effective in IT risk management ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". OneTrust GRC is most compared with RSA Archer, ProcessUnity, AuditBoard, Workiva Wdesk and LogicGate, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM. See our OneTrust GRC vs. SecurityScorecard report.
See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
