We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."One of the most beneficial features of the solution is the user provisioning and the de-provisioning feature."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"The MFA part is the best. MFA provided most of the security that we were looking at with respect to the second level of authentication. Okta Workforce Identity provides a number of options with respect to multifactor authentication, such as the app, phone call, and text. These options provide different ways of logging in for users, and they were a lot more than what we needed. This is certainly a very good feature of Okta Workforce Identity."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"The initial setup can be complex at first."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"The solution should have greater on-premises availability, not just cloud and more package customization in its processing."
"We experienced some technical glitches that need to be resolved."
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"The stability could be better."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Access Management with 56 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 27th in Access Management. Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Access Management vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.